Re: Perl Packages

2001-08-25 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote: > I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about > packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ? Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/ Cheers, tony [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Perl Packages

2001-08-25 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote: > I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about > packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ? Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/ Cheers, tony [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: debconf trouble

2001-08-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:10:47PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Moin, > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 08:50:19PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > #include > > Christian T. Steigies wrote on Sat Aug 25, 2001 um 01:12:53PM: > > > > > debconf (developer): frontend started > > > debconf (developer):

Re: Re: /proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Hereward Cooper
> Um, where are you getting kernels without /proc support? > For most systems > that would be very broken. I beleive, but obviously havn't > double checked > that all Debian kernels have proc enabled. I realize that most systems will have /proc support, i havn't seen one that doesn't have it,

Re: debconf trouble

2001-08-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Moin, On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 08:50:19PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > Christian T. Steigies wrote on Sat Aug 25, 2001 um 01:12:53PM: > > > debconf (developer): frontend started > > debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is moon-buggy > > debconf (developer): starting /var/

Re: debconf trouble

2001-08-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Christian T. Steigies wrote on Sat Aug 25, 2001 um 01:12:53PM: > debconf (developer): frontend started > debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is moon-buggy > debconf (developer): starting /var/lib/dpkg/info/moon-buggy.config configure > 0.5.52-6 > debconf (developer): <--

debconf trouble

2001-08-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Hi folks, debconf is driving me crazy. I am using debconf on a multi binary package to display a note. Its working fine in one package but not at all in the main package and I do not understand why. Installing the package (with DEBUG) gives me this: Unpacking replacement moon-buggy ... Setting up

RE: Lintian error: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-ve

2001-08-25 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
my @bashism_regexs = ( 'function \w+\(\s*\)', # function is useless # should be '.', not 'source' '(?:^|\s+)source\s+(?:\.\/|\/|\$)[^\s]+', '(\[|test|-o|-a)\s*[^\s]+\s+==\s', # should be 'b =

Re: /proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Nicolas Lopez
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:29:17AM +, Hereward Cooper wrote: > Hi, > > Is there anyway that i can make a dependancy for /proc kernel > support? Um, where are you getting kernels without /proc support? For most systems that would be very broken. I beleive, but obviously havn't double checke

Re: Re: /proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Hereward Cooper
> Um, where are you getting kernels without /proc support? > For most systems > that would be very broken. I beleive, but obviously havn't > double checked > that all Debian kernels have proc enabled. I realize that most systems will have /proc support, i havn't seen one that doesn't have it,

Re: debconf trouble

2001-08-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Christian T. Steigies wrote on Sat Aug 25, 2001 um 01:12:53PM: > debconf (developer): frontend started > debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is moon-buggy > debconf (developer): starting /var/lib/dpkg/info/moon-buggy.config configure 0.5.52-6 > debconf (developer): <-- I

Re: Lintian error: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version bash

2001-08-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:52:52PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:20:28AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Lastly, is there a reliable way of confirming that I do not in fact have any > > bashisms, so that #!/bin/sh would be sufficient? sh is linked to bash, so > > simply wr

RE: Lintian error: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-ve

2001-08-25 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
my @bashism_regexs = ( 'function \w+\(\s*\)', # function is useless # should be '.', not 'source' '(?:^|\s+)source\s+(?:\.\/|\/|\$)[^\s]+', '(\[|test|-o|-a)\s*[^\s]+\s+==\s', # should be 'b

Re: /proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Nicolas Lopez
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:29:17AM +, Hereward Cooper wrote: > Hi, > > Is there anyway that i can make a dependancy for /proc kernel > support? Um, where are you getting kernels without /proc support? For most systems that would be very broken. I beleive, but obviously havn't double check

Re: /proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Joost van Baal
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:29:17AM +, Hereward Cooper wrote: > > Is there anyway that i can make a dependancy for /proc kernel > support? See http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt for a nice but not yet implemented idea. Bye, Joost -- Joost van Baal.

/proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Hereward Cooper
Hi, Is there anyway that i can make a dependancy for /proc kernel support? Thanks, Hereward

Re: /proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Joost van Baal
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:29:17AM +, Hereward Cooper wrote: > > Is there anyway that i can make a dependancy for /proc kernel > support? See http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt for a nice but not yet implemented idea. Bye, Joost -- Joost van Baal.

/proc file system

2001-08-25 Thread Hereward Cooper
Hi, Is there anyway that i can make a dependancy for /proc kernel support? Thanks, Hereward -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]