Title: n09°¡ ¿ÀÇ ÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù.
* ±ÍÇÏÀÇ Çã¶ôµµ ¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»´Â °ÍÀ» ³Ê±×·¯ÀÌ ¿ë¼ ¹Ù¶ø´Ï´Ù.
*
´ÙÀ½¿¡ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» ¹ÞÁö¾ÊÀ½
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Jon Middleton wrote:
> Now I'm seeing a warning from dpkg-source about it ignoring file
> deletions. So when the sources are unpacked theres the moved files
> along with the original ones. Dose anyone konw the best way of dealing with
> this type of problem ?
I have an aut
Hi,
In the last upload of libnetserver-generic-perl I fixed a bug where the
test scripts were being installed into the perl path. I did this by
moving these scripts into a subdirectory.
Now I'm seeing a warning from dpkg-source about it ignoring file
deletions. So when the sources are unpacke
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Jon Middleton wrote:
> Now I'm seeing a warning from dpkg-source about it ignoring file
> deletions. So when the sources are unpacked theres the moved files
> along with the original ones. Dose anyone konw the best way of dealing with
> this type of problem ?
I have an au
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:21:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > * Fixed in previous upload: Closes #xxx, #yyy, #zzz
>
> > > That makes no sense to me; it's just noise in the changelog (and it
> > > doesn't tell the submitter anything useful, since it doesn't say *how*
>
> > Hear, hear. The r
Hi,
In the last upload of libnetserver-generic-perl I fixed a bug where the
test scripts were being installed into the perl path. I did this by
moving these scripts into a subdirectory.
Now I'm seeing a warning from dpkg-source about it ignoring file
deletions. So when the sources are unpack
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 12:45:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 01:37:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > * Fixed in previous upload: Closes #xxx, #yyy, #zzz
> > That makes no sense to me; it's just noise in the changelog (and it
> > doesn't tell the submitter anything u
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:21:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > * Fixed in previous upload: Closes #xxx, #yyy, #zzz
>
> > > That makes no sense to me; it's just noise in the changelog (and it
> > > doesn't tell the submitter anything useful, since it doesn't say *how*
>
> > Hear, hear. The
I'm looking for somebody to sponsor an upload of blootbot, all the
stuff is at http://asuffield.n3.net/debian
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
pgplUHOqfcSOl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010713 15:36]:
> What should I do to get the key replaced? I assume it has to be
> signed by a debian developer, but afterwards?
Then send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with an explanation.
> Any debian developer near Salzburg, Austria, willing to sign my key?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 12:45:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 01:37:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > * Fixed in previous upload: Closes #xxx, #yyy, #zzz
> > That makes no sense to me; it's just noise in the changelog (and it
> > doesn't tell the submitter anything
I'm looking for somebody to sponsor an upload of blootbot, all the
stuff is at http://asuffield.n3.net/debian
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
PGP signature
* Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010713 15:36]:
> What should I do to get the key replaced? I assume it has to be
> signed by a debian developer, but afterwards?
Then send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with an explanation.
> Any debian developer near Salzburg, Austria, willing to sign my key?
13 matches
Mail list logo
