>>"jae" == Jürgen A Erhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Manoj> Email ID's have value. Some one comes up with, say, a
Manoj> First National Bank ID, and one trusts that ID, perhaps
Manoj> some informatiopn can be given out since the p
>>"Ralf" == Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Jimmy> Would you have a problem with common nicknames such as Jimmy,
Jimmy> or would you need to see do
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:07:02PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> Really? The entry form at the NM corner has this scary warning:
[...]
> So which is it? I've already created the packages I'm going to maintain,
> but I don't have my GPG key signed yet, nor do I have an advocate.
> What's the next s
Thanks. In my digging today I found the archtable - and it
is indeed compiled in. I think the version I have doesn't
have the right/full archtable in it.
Here's another quetion. The system I'm compiling on is
missing.
/usr/include/floatingpoint.h
/usr/include/math.h
/usr/inc
> We are using dpkg on Solaris to manage packages. I am having a
> couple of difficulties.
>
> 1. I've built a package, but when I install it I get this error.
>
> dpkg: warning, architecture `sun4u-sunos-5.8' not in remapping table
> dpkg: error processing reng.cgiemail-1.6-v-1.deb (--install):
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:07:02PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> Really? The entry form at the NM corner has this scary warning:
[...]
> So which is it? I've already created the packages I'm going to maintain,
> but I don't have my GPG key signed yet, nor do I have an advocate.
> What's the next
Thanks. In my digging today I found the archtable - and it
is indeed compiled in. I think the version I have doesn't
have the right/full archtable in it.
Here's another quetion. The system I'm compiling on is
missing.
/usr/include/floatingpoint.h
/usr/include/math.h
/usr/in
> We are using dpkg on Solaris to manage packages. I am having a
> couple of difficulties.
>
> 1. I've built a package, but when I install it I get this error.
>
> dpkg: warning, architecture `sun4u-sunos-5.8' not in remapping table
> dpkg: error processing reng.cgiemail-1.6-v-1.deb (--install):
> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Manoj> Email ID's have value. Some one comes up with, say, a
Manoj> First National Bank ID, and one trusts that ID, perhaps
Manoj> some informatiopn can be given out since the person works
Manoj> for the bank anyway.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 06:23:21PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> Simple question for the day:
>
> Should a package that has a symlink to undocumented(7) also have a Depends:
> on the package that contains undocumented(7) (manpages)? It seems silly to
> me that a package could have a symlink to a non
On 06-Jul-2001 Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work
>> ready when you apply. So if you have a package ready for submission and
>> peer
>> review, submit an applicatio
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work
> ready when you apply. So if you have a package ready for submission and peer
> review, submit an application.
Really? The entry form at the NM corner
> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Manoj> Email ID's have value. Some one comes up with, say, a
Manoj> First National Bank ID, and one trusts that ID, perhaps
Manoj> some informatiopn can be given out since the person works
Manoj> for the bank anyway
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 06:23:21PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> Simple question for the day:
>
> Should a package that has a symlink to undocumented(7) also have a Depends:
> on the package that contains undocumented(7) (manpages)? It seems silly to
> me that a package could have a symlink to a no
On 06-Jul-2001 Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work
>> ready when you apply. So if you have a package ready for submission and
>> peer
>> review, submit an applicati
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work
> ready when you apply. So if you have a package ready for submission and peer
> review, submit an application.
Really? The entry form at the NM corne
We are using dpkg on Solaris to manage packages. I am having a
couple of difficulties.
1. I've built a package, but when I install it I get this error.
dpkg: warning, architecture `sun4u-sunos-5.8' not in remapping table
dpkg: error processing reng.cgiemail-1.6-v-1.deb (--install):
package archi
Ralf Treinen (2001-07-06 12:54:36 +0200) :
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Jimmy/James are acceptable social contractions/tranforms. I'd
>
> This might be the case for people with an American cultural background.
> People elsewhere in the world might ha
We are using dpkg on Solaris to manage packages. I am having a
couple of difficulties.
1. I've built a package, but when I install it I get this error.
dpkg: warning, architecture `sun4u-sunos-5.8' not in remapping table
dpkg: error processing reng.cgiemail-1.6-v-1.deb (--install):
package arch
Ralf Treinen (2001-07-06 12:54:36 +0200) :
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Jimmy/James are acceptable social contractions/tranforms. I'd
>
> This might be the case for people with an American cultural background.
> People elsewhere in the world might h
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
> Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
> Jimmy> showed ID that had th
> The question is: which do I do first, announce my
> intentions to debian-devel or submit a new main-
> tainer application? The application seems to want
> me to announce. Other docs seem to indicate
> that I should become a maintainer first.
You announce your intent to package, or adopt the pa
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
> Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
> Jimmy> showed ID that had t
Simple question for the day:
Should a package that has a symlink to undocumented(7) also have a Depends:
on the package that contains undocumented(7) (manpages)? It seems silly to
me that a package could have a symlink to a non-existant man page in place
of its own non-existant man page.
--
Sam C
> The question is: which do I do first, announce my
> intentions to debian-devel or submit a new main-
> tainer application? The application seems to want
> me to announce. Other docs seem to indicate
> that I should become a maintainer first.
>
either is fine. Do both at the same time (-: Th
> The question is: which do I do first, announce my
> intentions to debian-devel or submit a new main-
> tainer application? The application seems to want
> me to announce. Other docs seem to indicate
> that I should become a maintainer first.
You announce your intent to package, or adopt the p
Good Day!
I have read the materials regarding becoming a
package maintainer and have chosen an orphaned
package. However, either I don't quite
understand the correct order of things or there is
an inconsistency in the new maintainer docs. My
money is on the former.
The question is: which do I d
Simple question for the day:
Should a package that has a symlink to undocumented(7) also have a Depends:
on the package that contains undocumented(7) (manpages)? It seems silly to
me that a package could have a symlink to a non-existant man page in place
of its own non-existant man page.
--
Sam
28 matches
Mail list logo
