Re: Host system type detected by autoconf

2001-06-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 10:12:34AM +0530, Viral wrote: > How do I get my packages to build for the host type 'i386-pc-linux-gnu' > rather than 'i686-pc-linux-gnu' ? Use the --host switch to configure. -- - mdz

Host system type detected by autoconf

2001-06-30 Thread Viral
Hi, How do I get my packages to build for the host type 'i386-pc-linux-gnu' rather than 'i686-pc-linux-gnu' ? Is it possible to do this via some environment variable ? viral -- I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon.

Autoconfig 2.13 failing to detect tcl/tk

2001-06-30 Thread Brett Cundal
Hiya, I'm trying to put together a package that uses tk, but the config script that comes with the upstream package doesn't detect tcl or tk properly... The tests are just completely wrong... I guess the Debian packages for tcl/tk put things in non-standard locations? Anyhow, I imagine there are

Re: Host system type detected by autoconf

2001-06-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:29:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 10:12:34AM +0530, Viral wrote: > > > > > How do I get my packages to build for the host type 'i386-pc-linux-gnu' > > > rather than 'i686-pc-linux-gnu' ? > > > > Use the --host switch to configure. >

Re: Host system type detected by autoconf

2001-06-30 Thread sharkey
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 10:12:34AM +0530, Viral wrote: > > > How do I get my packages to build for the host type 'i386-pc-linux-gnu' > > rather than 'i686-pc-linux-gnu' ? > > Use the --host switch to configure. Uh, how would you do that? I mean, what would you add to your debian/rules file t

Re: Host system type detected by autoconf

2001-06-30 Thread Viral
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 10:12:34AM +0530, Viral wrote: > > > How do I get my packages to build for the host type 'i386-pc-linux-gnu' > > rather than 'i686-pc-linux-gnu' ? > > Use the --host switch to configure. But wouldn't that

Re: Host system type detected by autoconf

2001-06-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 10:12:34AM +0530, Viral wrote: > How do I get my packages to build for the host type 'i386-pc-linux-gnu' > rather than 'i686-pc-linux-gnu' ? Use the --host switch to configure. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Host system type detected by autoconf

2001-06-30 Thread Viral
Hi, How do I get my packages to build for the host type 'i386-pc-linux-gnu' rather than 'i686-pc-linux-gnu' ? Is it possible to do this via some environment variable ? viral -- I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Autoconfig 2.13 failing to detect tcl/tk

2001-06-30 Thread Brett Cundal
Hiya, I'm trying to put together a package that uses tk, but the config script that comes with the upstream package doesn't detect tcl or tk properly... The tests are just completely wrong... I guess the Debian packages for tcl/tk put things in non-standard locations? Anyhow, I imagine there are

Re: GPG Key Signing

2001-06-30 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:13:34PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > When you see my signature on the key, it means that > i) The owner had two forms of photo ID, or a passport and other > possibly non-photo means of identification (of course, the > identification documents may

Re: GPG Key Signing

2001-06-30 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:13:34PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > When you see my signature on the key, it means that > i) The owner had two forms of photo ID, or a passport and other > possibly non-photo means of identification (of course, the > identification documents may

Re: GPG Key Signing

2001-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you >> verified actually controls the email address and the secret pass >> phrase adds no value to the web of trust? Steve> Out of curiosity, under what circumstances do you for

Re: GPG Key Signing (Was: Advocate/Sponsor)

2001-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Samuel> Well, then why not talk about "id signing" instead of "key Samuel> signing" which exists but designates a completely different Samuel> thing that also exists in GPG? Because these procedures have been known as key signin

Re: GPG Key Signing

2001-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you >> verified actually controls the email address and the secret pass >> phrase adds no value to the web of trust? Steve> Out of curiosity, under what circumstances do you fo

Re: GPG Key Signing (Was: Advocate/Sponsor)

2001-06-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Samuel> Well, then why not talk about "id signing" instead of "key Samuel> signing" which exists but designates a completely different Samuel> thing that also exists in GPG? Because these procedures have been known as key signi