On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Would you think it a good strategy for an xmlrpc-c application to link
> statically with its own version of your library, because there are
> set-ups out there which have a too old, too new, too screwed
> installation of xmlrpc-c?
Just to say thanks to all who helped. I am now leaving for a week
(going to France, but not Bordeaux), and will continue on packaging
when I get back.
Thanks again,
Etienne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
>Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>> What if you MOVED the file, rather than copying it: would dpkg still
>>> complain?
>>
>>Do it in preinst (and don't forget to add the proper error recov
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Would you think it a good strategy for an xmlrpc-c application to link
> statically with its own version of your library, because there are
> set-ups out there which have a too old, too new, too screwed
> installation of xmlrpc-c?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:35:11PM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
>
>
> From: Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> # > Would anyone be willing to send me the source tree of a debian
> # > package that wraps a perl program/module (or send me the url for one)?
> #
> # apt-get source lib*-per
Just to say thanks to all who helped. I am now leaving for a week
(going to France, but not Bordeaux), and will continue on packaging
when I get back.
Thanks again,
Etienne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
>Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>> What if you MOVED the file, rather than copying it: would dpkg still
>>> complain?
>>
>>Do it in preinst (and don't forget to add the proper error reco
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:35:11PM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
>
>
> From: Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> # > Would anyone be willing to send me the source tree of a debian
> # > package that wraps a perl program/module (or send me the url for one)?
> #
> # apt-get source lib*-pe
From: Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# > Would anyone be willing to send me the source tree of a debian
# > package that wraps a perl program/module (or send me the url for one)?
#
# apt-get source lib*-perl should do it.
Silly question : where do I get source packages? I did what I th
--- Begin Message ---
Have a look at www.d.o/devel/misc/, and use the tex-file if you want.
It's called 'business card' in english.
/Micce
--
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden+46 (0
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robbe> What additional security does this protocol offer over simple ID
> Robbe> checking? IOW, what problem does it solve?
> Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identit
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone
>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> What additional security does this protocol offer over simple ID
Robbe> checking? IOW, what problem does it solve?
Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you
verified actually controls the email address
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuel> It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign an
Samuel> id. That means that checking for one e-mail address for being
Samuel> valid and signing all the ids is just bogus. You may use this
Samuel> protocol, but you hav
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:53:56AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I have seen business cards from other developers who did use the logo. I
> think cards fall into the same category as clothing; if you're a Debian
> developer and it's not for profit, I think it's safe to use it. However, if
> you'
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I want make my own visiting cards (I'm not sure on the term 'visiting
> card', I hope is the right translation of the italian term 'biglietto da
> visita') and I want put in it the official debian logo, the bottle one.
'Business card'
From: Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# > Would anyone be willing to send me the source tree of a debian
# > package that wraps a perl program/module (or send me the url for one)?
#
# apt-get source lib*-perl should do it.
Silly question : where do I get source packages? I did what I t
Have a look at www.d.o/devel/misc/, and use the tex-file if you want.
It's called 'business card' in english.
/Micce
--
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden+46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile)
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robbe> What additional security does this protocol offer over simple ID
> Robbe> checking? IOW, what problem does it solve?
> Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identi
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone
>>"Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robbe> What additional security does this protocol offer over simple ID
Robbe> checking? IOW, what problem does it solve?
Are you implying that ensuring the person whose identity you
verified actually controls the email address
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuel> It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign an
Samuel> id. That means that checking for one e-mail address for being
Samuel> valid and signing all the ids is just bogus. You may use this
Samuel> protocol, but you ha
I want make my own visiting cards (I'm not sure on the term 'visiting
card', I hope is the right translation of the italian term 'biglietto da
visita') and I want put in it the official debian logo, the bottle one.
From the logos page:
Permission has been given to use the official logo on clo
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:53:56AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I have seen business cards from other developers who did use the logo. I
> think cards fall into the same category as clothing; if you're a Debian
> developer and it's not for profit, I think it's safe to use it. However, if
> you
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I want make my own visiting cards (I'm not sure on the term 'visiting
> card', I hope is the right translation of the italian term 'biglietto da
> visita') and I want put in it the official debian logo, the bottle one.
'Business card'
Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
>
> | http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
> |
> | it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
> | i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
What additional security
Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) xmlrpc-c applications must run on distros which provide a copy of
> libexpat, and ones which don't. Since the libexpat sonames have not
> been incremented in a correct manner on all distributions, it's
> extremely hard for me rely on pre
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Danie,
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> > going to be easy though.
>
> A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to b
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
> dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6
> package `bloksi':
> `Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
> dh_builddeb: command returned error code
> make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
>
> It
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
> this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
> think it is relevant to this list.
>
> I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
> that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
>
> I build it w/
I want make my own visiting cards (I'm not sure on the term 'visiting
card', I hope is the right translation of the italian term 'biglietto da
visita') and I want put in it the official debian logo, the bottle one.
From the logos page:
Permission has been given to use the official logo on cl
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
hi
>
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},${perl:Depends}
>
did you try to use debhelper and dh_perl?
cheers
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F
Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
>
> | http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
> |
> | it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
> | i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
What additional securit
Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) xmlrpc-c applications must run on distros which provide a copy of
> libexpat, and ones which don't. Since the libexpat sonames have not
> been incremented in a correct manner on all distributions, it's
> extremely hard for me rely on pr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Danie,
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> > going to be easy though.
>
> A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
> dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
>`bloksi':
> `Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
> dh_builddeb: command returned error code
> make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
>
> It
On 06/29/01 Etienne Grossmann wrote:
> this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
> think it is relevant to this list.
>
> I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
> that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
>
> I build it w
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:00:47AM +1000, Sam Johnston wrote:
> >
[snip]
> > - debconf doesn't append '|| true' to the init.d stop in prerm. this
> > means that when start-stop-daemon returns 1 the removal/upgrade fails
> > miserably if the dae
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Etienne Grossmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
hi
>
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},${perl:Depends}
>
did you try to use debhelper and dh_perl?
cheers
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0
Hello,
I also had the problem of
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`bloksi':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
It seemed t
Hello,
this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
think it is relevant to this list.
I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
I build it w/ the help of the "New Maintainer's Guide
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:55:40AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > when i run "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" to create a package, i get the
> > following error:
> >
> > dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/es
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:00:47AM +1000, Sam Johnston wrote:
> >
[snip]
> > - debconf doesn't append '|| true' to the init.d stop in prerm. this
> > means that when start-stop-daemon returns 1 the removal/upgrade fails
> > miserably if the da
Hello,
I also had the problem of
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`bloksi':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
It seemed
44 matches
Mail list logo
