Hello,
this is a near-copy of a mail I sent yesterday to debian-perl. I
think it is relevant to this list.
I just managed to build a working .deb from a perl program (a game
that uses gtk and gnome), after a fair amount of cruft (*).
I build it w/ the help of the "New Maintainer's Guid
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:55:40AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > when i run "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" to create a package, i get the following
>error:
> >
> > dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/esms
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when i run "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" to create a package, i get the
> following error:
>
> dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/esms/DEBIAN/control' near line 6
> package `esms':
> `Depends' field, missing packa
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when i run "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" to create a package, i get the following
>error:
>
> dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/esms/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
>`esms':
> `Depends' field, missing packag
Hello,
when i run "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" to create a package, i get the
following error:
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/esms/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`esms':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned e
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:00:47AM +1000, Sam Johnston wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying my hand at a somewhat more challenging package this time, which
> uses debconf to extract a username and password from the user whichi is
> stored in a config file in /etc and used to start a daemon (specif
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:11:13 +0200, Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Braakman (2001-06-28 18:00:46 +0300) :
>
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> >> > Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase.
> >>
> >> What item in D
Hello,
when i run "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" to create a package, i get the following
error:
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/esms/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package `esms':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned e
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:00:47AM +1000, Sam Johnston wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying my hand at a somewhat more challenging package this time, which
> uses debconf to extract a username and password from the user whichi is
> stored in a config file in /etc and used to start a daemon (speci
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:11:13 +0200, Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Braakman (2001-06-28 18:00:46 +0300) :
>
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> >> > Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase.
> >>
> >> What item in
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> | > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> | > had been under the impression that other forms of identif
Hello all,
I'm trying my hand at a somewhat more challenging package this time, which
uses debconf to extract a username and password from the user whichi is
stored in a config file in /etc and used to start a daemon (specifically a
login client). I've got a couple of problems though:
- debco
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:05:55PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
>
> > Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=toronto%20debian
> ?
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/spo
On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
| > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
| > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
| > were still possible, though severely discour
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
|
| comments welcome.
It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> PKI as part of the NM process.
manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
available in HTML at
http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysig
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> were still possible, though severely discouraged.
Yeah, those forms still exist. The web
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
> your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
> After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
> I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual physi
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
> Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
http://www.google.com/search?q=toronto%20debian
?
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole
I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual physical meeting.
Photo ID appears to be acceptible.
>
>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> | > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> | > had been under the impression that other forms of identif
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:31:54AM -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> You need a signed gpg key, but not an advocate when you apply -- the
> message currently printed is not clear, though. I have fixed that
> now. (It should have said that you needed a GPG signd key.)
Does the GPG key need to be
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, as maintainer of the expat and libxmltok packages I would
> > really appreciate it if you could make an effort to use the
> > standalone copy.
>
> What he said! It avoids
Danie,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to be your
advocate; in fact, it doesn't have to be your advocate who signs your key
Hello all,
I'm trying my hand at a somewhat more challenging package this time, which
uses debconf to extract a username and password from the user whichi is
stored in a config file in /etc and used to start a daemon (specifically a
login client). I've got a couple of problems though:
- debc
Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
Ilia Lobsanov
Nurey Networks Inc.
http://www.nurey.net/
GPG key: http://mail.lobsanov.com/pubkey.gpg
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:05:55PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
>
> > Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=toronto%20debian
> ?
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sp
On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
| > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
| > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
| > were still possible, though severely discour
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
|
| comments welcome.
It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign
Richard Braakman (2001-06-28 18:00:46 +0300) :
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
>> > Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase.
>>
>> What item in Debian Policy? you mean policy 2.3.1 or something?
>
> It's not in Debian Policy, it's
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> PKI as part of the NM process.
manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
available in HTML at
http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysi
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> were still possible, though severely discouraged.
Yeah, those forms still exist. The web
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> > Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase.
>
> What item in Debian Policy? you mean policy 2.3.1 or something?
It's not in Debian Policy, it's a Unix tradition going back 30 years.
Richard Braakman
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
> your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
> After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
> I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual phys
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
> Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
http://www.google.com/search?q=toronto%20debian
?
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePol
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:54:43PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to build
* Mikael Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010628 14:29]:
> I have a question about that. I filled in the webform on
> http://nm.debian.org/newnm.php last week, checked every botton except
> the gpg key and if I have an advocate.
> The webform warned about that I haven't got my key signed etc.
> Shou
I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual physical meeting.
Photo ID appears to be acceptible.
>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:31:54AM -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> You need a signed gpg key, but not an advocate when you apply -- the
> message currently printed is not clear, though. I have fixed that
> now. (It should have said that you needed a GPG signd key.)
Does the GPG key need to be
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, as maintainer of the expat and libxmltok packages I would
> > really appreciate it if you could make an effort to use the
> > standalone copy.
>
> What he said! It avoids
Danie,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to be your
advocate; in fact, it doesn't have to be your advocate who signs your ke
Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
Ilia Lobsanov
Nurey Networks Inc.
http://www.nurey.net/
GPG key: http://mail.lobsanov.com/pubkey.gpg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Braakman (2001-06-28 18:00:46 +0300) :
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
>> > Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase.
>>
>> What item in Debian Policy? you mean policy 2.3.1 or something?
>
> It's not in Debian Policy, it's
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian,
> an advocate geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to
> meet him/her to prove your identity so debian allows you to join the
> community. see http://nm.debian.o
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:08:33AM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> > Yes. poEdit is a horrible name. Command names should be all lowercase.
>
> What item in Debian Policy? you mean policy 2.3.1 or something?
It's not in Debian Policy, it's a Unix tradition going back 30 years.
Richard Braakman
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to build
> > binaries t
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:54:43PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to buil
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:53:55 +0200, Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
>
> For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
sorry i got confused... i'm currently appliing to becom
* Mikael Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010628 14:29]:
> I have a question about that. I filled in the webform on
> http://nm.debian.org/newnm.php last week, checked every botton except
> the gpg key and if I have an advocate.
> The webform warned about that I haven't got my key signed etc.
> Sho
I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
going to be easy though.
For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:38:36PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian,
Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian, an
advocate geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to meet
him/her to prove your identity so debian allows you to join the community. see
http://nm.debian.org/ for more info.
--
Robert Millan
I need a sponsor.
The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
written in Python with one widget written in C.
It uses autoconf and automake. Because of the Python/C combination, this was an
in
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian,
> an advocate geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to
> meet him/her to prove your identity so debian allows you to join the
> community. see http://nm.debian.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to build
> > binaries
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:53:55 +0200, Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
>
> For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
sorry i got confused... i'm currently appliing to beco
I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
going to be easy though.
For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:38:36PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian
Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian, an advocate
geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to meet him/her to prove
your identity so debian allows you to join the community. see http://nm.debian.org/
for more info.
--
Robert Millan
I need a sponsor.
The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
written in Python with one widget written in C.
It uses autoconf and automake. Because of the Python/C combination, this was an
i
58 matches
Mail list logo
