Interesting :) What did you do to land you in prison?
I mean, presumably something harmless but illegal.
The problem with being arrested is of course if later
one wants to be a government employee, or a
politician, or ... wait a sec, those are not really
aspirable jobs. And if you are a writer any
I hate the whole concept of prison, I must say that mine was the most
intelligent and humane prison, probably that existed in America. And
the warden, a man by the name of Thieman, was a very
decent man, a very decent man. And so, I hate to say that I enjoyed
the experience, but I'd always had a f
Interesting :) What did you do to land you in prison?
I mean, presumably something harmless but illegal.
The problem with being arrested is of course if later
one wants to be a government employee, or a
politician, or ... wait a sec, those are not really
aspirable jobs. And if you are a writer an
I hate the whole concept of prison, I must say that mine was the most
intelligent and humane prison, probably that existed in America. And
the warden, a man by the name of Thieman, was a very
decent man, a very decent man. And so, I hate to say that I enjoyed
the experience, but I'd always had a
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would like clarify the reason for lame not being included in the debian
> > archives, not even non-US.
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
>
> IIRC your questions are addresse
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After a standard period of time (10 days for normal packages I
> think), the package gets copied (symlink) to testing if the
> following conditions are met:
> - binaries are available for main architectures (i386, alpha,
> sparc, but the others
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would like clarify the reason for lame not being included in the debian
> > archives, not even non-US.
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
>
> IIRC your questions are address
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After a standard period of time (10 days for normal packages I
> think), the package gets copied (symlink) to testing if the
> following conditions are met:
> - binaries are available for main architectures (i386, alpha,
> sparc, but the others
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:12:34PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:10:30PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> >
> > Choice 3 is best. People who live in countries where the use of cryptography
> > is restricted are probably subject to being arbitrarily jailed or murdered
>
>>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jimmy> That would be easier. I did sort of want to keep a Makefile in
Jimmy> place that is called Makefile, so that a simple "make" command
Jimmy> still works, but I guess that could be taken care of by a
Jimmy> symlink. Thanks for the s
10 matches
Mail list logo
