On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > or build dependencies on debhelper (>>3.0)
> >
> > Yes, but since i want ot build the package on both potato and unstable, this
> > will not help.
>
> Why exactly? It's not a crime to create two separate
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010403 18:45]:
> > Maybe all manpage needing binaries could be listed somewhere, and
> > we could | have a manpage writing task ?
>
> http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
The web page now shows who is working on the man pages
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:31:27PM -0400, Chris Ruffin wrote:
>
> How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm
> trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial
> vendor tag that I used to import previous versions!
Does "cvs status -v" help you?
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010403 18:45]:
> > Maybe all manpage needing binaries could be listed somewhere, and
> > we could | have a manpage writing task ?
>
> http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
The web page now shows who is working on the man pages
>>"Chris" == Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm
Chris> trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial
Chris> vendor tag that I used to import previous versions!
cvs status -v ; or just le
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:16:57PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> > dh_testversion
>
> erm, ... this is told to be depredated (or whatever is the correct writting of
> this word) by the build dependency stuff. It also don't seems to do anything
> on a unstable system.
AFAIK,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:31:27PM -0400, Chris Ruffin wrote:
>
> How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm
> trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial
> vendor tag that I used to import previous versions!
Does "cvs status -v" help you?
Steve M. Robbins:
> The undocumented page provides no more information than "No manual
> entry for foo" (but the former is much longer to read). What is the
> point?
Personally, I reason that if I get "No manual entry", it is a program
that probably shouldn't have entered myself, but if I get und
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:00:31AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > >
> > > What is the point?
> > policy :)
>
> i hate that catch 22.
>
> can't file a bug
>>"Chris" == Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm
Chris> trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial
Chris> vendor tag that I used to import previous versions!
cvs status -v ; or just l
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:16:57PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> > dh_testversion
>
> erm, ... this is told to be depredated (or whatever is the correct writting of
> this word) by the build dependency stuff. It also don't seems to do anything
> on a unstable system.
AFAIK,
* Sven LUTHER
| Maybe all manpage needing binaries could be listed somewhere, and we could
| have a manpage writing task ?
http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
:)
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > What is the point?
> policy :)
i hate that catch 22.
can't file a bug, since the package is not in debian[1]
can't use undocumented, unless you have a bug ag
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:25:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> > The version of debhelper on potato does not recognize
> > DH_COMPAT=3. That is a feature in the debhelper ver >3.0. That may
> > explain the problem of building
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:16:57PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > > I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' i
Steve M. Robbins:
> The undocumented page provides no more information than "No manual
> entry for foo" (but the former is much longer to read). What is the
> point?
Personally, I reason that if I get "No manual entry", it is a program
that probably shouldn't have entered myself, but if I get un
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
> > attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
>
> A
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:00:31AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > >
> > > What is the point?
> > policy :)
>
> i hate that catch 22.
>
> can't file a bu
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> The version of debhelper on potato does not recognize
> DH_COMPAT=3. That is a feature in the debhelper ver >3.0. That may
> explain the problem of building on a potato machine.
If i want to do a package that can be compiled even o
* Sven LUTHER
| Maybe all manpage needing binaries could be listed somewhere, and we could
| have a manpage writing task ?
http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
:)
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > What is the point?
> policy :)
i hate that catch 22.
can't file a bug, since the package is not in debian[1]
can't use undocumented, unless you have a bug a
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like t
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:25:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> > The version of debhelper on potato does not recognize
> > DH_COMPAT=3. That is a feature in the debhelper ver >3.0. That may
> > explain the problem of buildin
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:16:57PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > > I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3'
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
> attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
Aigh, no, please don't do that!
Those drive me crazy!!
The undocumented page pro
Karel Gardas wrote:
> I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
> attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
with dh_undocumented.
A quote from its manpage:
Note that Debian policy prohibits links to undocumented(7)
unless the pac
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:49:41AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
> > attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
>
>
Hi,
I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
> > > debian/rules.
> >
> > The version of debhelper on potato do
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
> > debian/rules.
> > Some user report me the impossibility of build the same package from
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> The version of debhelper on potato does not recognize
> DH_COMPAT=3. That is a feature in the debhelper ver >3.0. That may
> explain the problem of building on a potato machine.
If i want to do a package that can be compiled even
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
> debian/rules.
> Some user report me the impossibility of build the same package from the
> sources on a debian potato.
> The compilation fail on dh_clean that
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
> attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
Aigh, no, please don't do that!
Those drive me crazy!!
The undocumented page pr
Karel Gardas wrote:
> I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
> attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
with dh_undocumented.
A quote from its manpage:
Note that Debian policy prohibits links to undocumented(7)
unless the pa
Hi,
I have many binaries compiled from my source package and I would like to
attach 'undocumented' man page to these files. How can I do it?
Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
> > > debian/rules.
> >
> > The version of debhelper on potato d
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
> > debian/rules.
> > Some user report me the impossibility of build the same package from
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
> debian/rules.
> Some user report me the impossibility of build the same package from the
> sources on a debian potato.
> The compilation fail on dh_clean tha
I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
debian/rules.
Some user report me the impossibility of build the same package from the
sources on a debian potato.
The compilation fail on dh_clean that right report an error.
If I turn DH_COMPAT to 2 all compile correctly even o
I've done the ocaml-findlib package with 'export DH_COMPAT=3' in the
debian/rules.
Some user report me the impossibility of build the same package from the
sources on a debian potato.
The compilation fail on dh_clean that right report an error.
If I turn DH_COMPAT to 2 all compile correctly even
41 matches
Mail list logo
