Hello,
I translate Debian Constitution into Korean. However, I am stuck at the meaning
of "Concorde Vote Counting". Anyone explain it to me into plain english?
PGP signature
Hi Massimo!
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> The nroff command is executed by a tcl script invoked by the makefile
> to process some tcl man pages. Finding all such dependencies would mean
> examining every source file.
>
> Is there any tool or trick to find automatically all buil
Matt,
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:46:30AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Which parts of the Samba source does it use? Does it just include header
> files, or does it compile and link with code there?
> There is a module, libpam-smb, which sounds similar to your program, which
> includes a smal
Hi Massimo!
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> The nroff command is executed by a tcl script invoked by the makefile
> to process some tcl man pages. Finding all such dependencies would mean
> examining every source file.
>
> Is there any tool or trick to find automatically all bui
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:46:30AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm the upstream maintainer on a PAM module, pam_smbpass, which I'm
> interested in packaging for Debian. The catch is that the module requires
> that a complete (well, nearly complete) copy of the Samba source code be
> available
Matt,
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:46:30AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Which parts of the Samba source does it use? Does it just include header
> files, or does it compile and link with code there?
> There is a module, libpam-smb, which sounds similar to your program, which
> includes a sma
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I can sponsor and advocate you when you:
> - raise the Standards-Version of the package to at least 3.1.0
> (you have to include build dependencies for this)
> - send an ITP and close it in the changelog
>
Thank you for y
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:46:30AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm the upstream maintainer on a PAM module, pam_smbpass, which I'm
> interested in packaging for Debian. The catch is that the module requires
> that a complete (well, nearly complete) copy of the Samba source code be
> available
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I can sponsor and advocate you when you:
> - raise the Standards-Version of the package to at least 3.1.0
> (you have to include build dependencies for this)
> - send an ITP and close it in the changelog
>
Thank you for
> Package: tclx8.2
> Version: 8.2.0-5
> Severity: serious
>
> tclx8.2 fails to autobuild due to missing nroff, provided by groff. groff
> isn't build essential so please add groff to build-depends.
>
> Michael
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> [...]
> Error: Error extracting he
Oi Henrique,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> I'm facing the same problem. I have a binary-all data package that is 26MB
> in size. I am not about to have both the binary .deb and source .deb 26MB in
> size... so I have a donwload target that will download upstream data in /tmp
>
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> build time. For questions of maintenance and bandwidth, I've chosen not to
> include the Samba source in the tarball; I find that automatically downloading
I'm facing the same problem. I have a binary-all data package that is 26MB
in size. I am not abo
Hello,
I'm the upstream maintainer on a PAM module, pam_smbpass, which I'm interested
in packaging for Debian. The catch is that the module requires that a
complete (well, nearly complete) copy of the Samba source code be available at
build time. For questions of maintenance and bandwidth, I've
> Package: tclx8.2
> Version: 8.2.0-5
> Severity: serious
>
> tclx8.2 fails to autobuild due to missing nroff, provided by groff. groff
> isn't build essential so please add groff to build-depends.
>
> Michael
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> [...]
> Error: Error extracting h
Oi Henrique,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> I'm facing the same problem. I have a binary-all data package that is 26MB
> in size. I am not about to have both the binary .deb and source .deb 26MB in
> size... so I have a donwload target that will download upstream data in /tmp
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> build time. For questions of maintenance and bandwidth, I've chosen not to
> include the Samba source in the tarball; I find that automatically downloading
I'm facing the same problem. I have a binary-all data package that is 26MB
in size. I am not ab
Hello,
I'm the upstream maintainer on a PAM module, pam_smbpass, which I'm interested
in packaging for Debian. The catch is that the module requires that a
complete (well, nearly complete) copy of the Samba source code be available at
build time. For questions of maintenance and bandwidth, I've
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:07:45PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Now, with db3, I want to be sure that everyone realizes that they are
> compiling against libdb3, since the binary on-disk format of the .db's
> is different. So, you have to explicitly tell your builds that you want
> -ldb3, so ther
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:31:30PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I've got Bug #90459, which says libXmu was not identified when
> > compiling on vore (that's sparc, isn't it? not that it's real
> > important).
> >
>
> (cgray4 ~)-> ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:07:45PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Now, with db3, I want to be sure that everyone realizes that they are
> compiling against libdb3, since the binary on-disk format of the .db's
> is different. So, you have to explicitly tell your builds that you want
> -ldb3, so the
Hi people,
I've been waiting in the DAM approval stage for more than 3 months. That's
pretty above the average. Nobody has contacted me, and I don't think there's
anything lacking in my application. I maintain nearly 10 packages, working
on a new one and plan to package many more. I put a lot of h
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:31:30PM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I've got Bug #90459, which says libXmu was not identified when
> > compiling on vore (that's sparc, isn't it? not that it's real
> > important).
> >
>
> (cgray4 ~)-> ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:53:55PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/text/xxdiff.html
> >
> > is still listing libstlport as NOT AVAILABLE, but:
> >
> > http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libstl&searchon=names&version=all&release=all
> >
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:11:35AM -0600, Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.) wrote:
> My question is this: All of this is fine and dandy, except that none
> of these packages are useful without a MOSIX kernel. Right now I see
> 4 options:
> 1) Include some sort of patched-kernel source package in
Hello!
I am a fairly new developer - just approved last week and only have
one 'original' package in the archive (vgrabbj)..
I also am now the proud new administrator of a 2-3 node MOSIX cluster
(soon to grow, hopefully). I have been seriously pondering packaging
the MOSIX tools for debian use
Hi people,
I've been waiting in the DAM approval stage for more than 3 months. That's
pretty above the average. Nobody has contacted me, and I don't think there's
anything lacking in my application. I maintain nearly 10 packages, working
on a new one and plan to package many more. I put a lot of
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:53:55PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/text/xxdiff.html
> >
> > is still listing libstlport as NOT AVAILABLE, but:
> >
> >
>http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libstl&searchon=names&version=all&release=all
>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:11:35AM -0600, Michael Janssen (CS/MATH stud.) wrote:
> My question is this: All of this is fine and dandy, except that none
> of these packages are useful without a MOSIX kernel. Right now I see
> 4 options:
> 1) Include some sort of patched-kernel source package i
Hello!
I am a fairly new developer - just approved last week and only have
one 'original' package in the archive (vgrabbj)..
I also am now the proud new administrator of a 2-3 node MOSIX cluster
(soon to grow, hopefully). I have been seriously pondering packaging
the MOSIX tools for debian us
29 matches
Mail list logo
