* Itai Zukerman
(please don't cc me, I'm on the list)
| 1. If all you're doing is a compile for a new architecture, then why
| is it necessary to bump the package version? If you modify *anything*
| in debian/* (for example, the Architecture or Build-Depends fields in
| debian/control), then
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:46:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
>
> First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
> number? I've read the man, the docs, an
Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
number? I've read the man, the docs, and so on, and can't find this. I mean, if
I have a package -3.2 dh_make returns
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:50:34PM +0100, Sergio Rua wrote:
>> Paul Slootman report me this bug (#86712) on ganso package. But I
>> can't locate whats the problem because it fail on gettext who it's provided
>> by libc6-dev.
>>
>> libc6-dev it is
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:07:14PM -0600, Justin Penney wrote:
|| Forgive me if i missed this somewhere else, but what is the best way to
|| simply sign and upload a package?
||
|| I'm referring to pppoe. The maintainer is having prolems with his gpg key
|| and can't upload.
Just in case...
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:19:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
> >
> > I asked a variation on the
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:50:34PM +0100, Sergio Rua wrote:
>> Paul Slootman report me this bug (#86712) on ganso package. But I
>> can't locate whats the problem because it fail on gettext who it's provided
>> by libc6-dev.
>>
>> libc6-dev it i
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:07:14PM -0600, Justin Penney wrote:
|| Forgive me if i missed this somewhere else, but what is the best way to
|| simply sign and upload a package?
||
|| I'm referring to pppoe. The maintainer is having prolems with his gpg key
|| and can't upload.
Just in case...
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:19:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
> >
> > I asked a variation on th
> You fall between two chairs - as noted in 7.4.3:
>
> What if you are simply recompiling the package? In this case, the
> process is different for porters than it is for non-porters, as
> mentioned above. If you are not a porter and are doing an NMU
> that simply requires a reco
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
>
> I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
> zero responses. Abor
Thanks. I'll do this.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:13:41PM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:43:45PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> > Hi. I have decided (and gotten permission) to package NISCA, which is a
> > program
> > that is similar to
> You fall between two chairs - as noted in 7.4.3:
>
> What if you are simply recompiling the package? In this case, the
> process is different for porters than it is for non-porters, as
> mentioned above. If you are not a porter and are doing an NMU
> that simply requires a rec
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:50:34PM +0100, Sergio Rua wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> Paul Slootman report me this bug (#86712) on ganso package. But I
> can't locate whats the problem because it fail on gettext who it's provided
> by libc6-dev.
>
> libc6-dev it isn't on Build-Depends. Sould
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:27:05PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For the various auto-builders, is it possible to get logs of any failed
> builds sent via e-mail, or do one have to go hunt around to try to find
> them using the various web interfaces?
sparc: http://vore.debian.org/buildl
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
>
> I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
> zero responses. Abo
Thanks. I'll do this.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:13:41PM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:43:45PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> > Hi. I have decided (and gotten permission) to package NISCA, which is a program
> > that is similar to but
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:50:34PM +0100, Sergio Rua wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> Paul Slootman report me this bug (#86712) on ganso package. But I
> can't locate whats the problem because it fail on gettext who it's provided
> by libc6-dev.
>
> libc6-dev it isn't on Build-Depends. Sould
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:27:05PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For the various auto-builders, is it possible to get logs of any failed
> builds sent via e-mail, or do one have to go hunt around to try to find
> them using the various web interfaces?
sparc: http://vore.debian.org/build
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything even
close, but it makes a
Hello!
Paul Slootman report me this bug (#86712) on ganso package. But I
can't locate whats the problem because it fail on gettext who it's provided
by libc6-dev.
libc6-dev it isn't on Build-Depends. Sould be on Build-Depends? Is
this the problem?
Thanks.
===
Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> Well, I'm not that familiar with debhelper yet. I mistakenly assumed that
> dh_installdocs would set the permissions of the installed files.
> If it just copies that's nuts.
> BTW I think it would be more suggestive if a command that installs doc
> files would set the per
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything even
close, but it makes a
Hello!
Paul Slootman report me this bug (#86712) on ganso package. But I
can't locate whats the problem because it fail on gettext who it's provided
by libc6-dev.
libc6-dev it isn't on Build-Depends. Sould be on Build-Depends? Is
this the problem?
Thanks.
==
[Please Cc: me... I'm not on this list]
Well, the person I thought would sponsor me isn't available. Can someone
else check + upload my tkrat packages? (Do I need closes: #...
statements?)
http://www.taral.net/tkrat-deb/
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
"Never as
* "Christian T. Steigies"
| On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > Yes, you are right. But there are not problems with hundreds of
| > packages, are there?
|
| No, only 80 known packages currently
| http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
| b
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:00:28 -0800
> From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Manfred Wassmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: debhelper and multiple README files
>
> Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> > Does dh_installdo
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Yes, you are right. But there are not problems with hundreds of
> packages, are there?
No, only 80 known packages currently
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
but an unknown number of not-yet-known proble
Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> Well, I'm not that familiar with debhelper yet. I mistakenly assumed that
> dh_installdocs would set the permissions of the installed files.
> If it just copies that's nuts.
> BTW I think it would be more suggestive if a command that installs doc
> files would set the pe
* "Christian T. Steigies"
| On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > * "Christian T. Steigies"
| >
| > | debian/changelog is not in source of the package. Is that really written
in
| > | the developers reference (too lazy to check that now)?
| >
| > Of course. If y
[Please Cc: me... I'm not on this list]
Well, the person I thought would sponsor me isn't available. Can someone
else check + upload my tkrat packages? (Do I need closes: #...
statements?)
http://www.taral.net/tkrat-deb/
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
"Never a
* "Christian T. Steigies"
| On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > Yes, you are right. But there are not problems with hundreds of
| > packages, are there?
|
| No, only 80 known packages currently
| http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
|
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:00:28 -0800
> From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Manfred Wassmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: debhelper and multiple README files
>
> Manfred Wassmann wrote:
> > Does dh_installdocs know about
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Yes, you are right. But there are not problems with hundreds of
> packages, are there?
No, only 80 known packages currently
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
but an unknown number of not-yet-known probl
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * "Christian T. Steigies"
>
> | On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
> | > 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads
* "Christian T. Steigies"
| On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > * "Christian T. Steigies"
| >
| > | debian/changelog is not in source of the package. Is that really written in
| > | the developers reference (too lazy to check that now)?
| >
| > Of course. If y
* "Christian T. Steigies"
| On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
| > 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads", the Developer's Reference says:
| >
| > In a binary NMU, no real change
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
> 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads", the Developer's Reference says:
>
> In a binary NMU, no real changes are being made to the source. You
>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * "Christian T. Steigies"
>
> | On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
> | > 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Upload
* "Christian T. Steigies"
| On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
| > 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads", the Developer's Reference says:
| >
| > In a binary NMU, no real chang
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
> 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads", the Developer's Reference says:
>
> In a binary NMU, no real changes are being made to the source. You
>
41 matches
Mail list logo