Hello All,
I'm currently in the new maintainer queue, and am awaiting approval of my
package by my AM. I'm looking for a maintainer/developer who could possibly
take a look at my package and see if there are any problems that could cause a
snag.
The package is mq3 (http://www.mq3.org) and the p
Hello All,
I'm currently in the new maintainer queue, and am awaiting approval of my package by
my AM. I'm looking for a maintainer/developer who could possibly take a look at my
package and see if there are any problems that could cause a snag.
The package is mq3 (http://www.mq3.org) and the p
Hello,
While trying to compile a package, I get the following warnings:
/home/ruff/debian/isakmpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:39: warning: redefinition of
`in_port_t'
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:66: warning: `in_port_t' previously declared here
/home/ruff/debian/isakmpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:40:
Hello,
While trying to compile a package, I get the following warnings:
/home/ruff/debian/isakmpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:39: warning: redefinition of
`in_port_t'
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:66: warning: `in_port_t' previously declared here
/home/ruff/debian/isakmpd/sysdep/linux/sysdep-os.h:40:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:53:52PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Jochen Voss wrote:
>
> > I have two question about Build-Depends:
>
> > (1) If I want to Build-Depend on packages A, B, C, D, E, and F. And A
> > depends on B, C, D, E, and F. Should I just mention A, because
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 12:25:44PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > (1) If I want to Build-Depend on packages A, B, C, D, E, and F. And A
> > depends on B, C, D, E, and F. Should I just mention A, because it
> > implies B to F or should I enumerate them all?
>
> the smallest set of depends,
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:53:52PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Jochen Voss wrote:
>
> > I have two question about Build-Depends:
>
> > (1) If I want to Build-Depend on packages A, B, C, D, E, and F. And A
> > depends on B, C, D, E, and F. Should I just mention A, becaus
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 12:25:44PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > (1) If I want to Build-Depend on packages A, B, C, D, E, and F. And A
> > depends on B, C, D, E, and F. Should I just mention A, because it
> > implies B to F or should I enumerate them all?
>
> the smallest set of depends
8 matches
Mail list logo
