Hi,
a few months ago, I tried packaging the perl module Net::GrpNetworks
(http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AR/ARVIEGAS/Net-GrpNetworks-1.08.tar.gz,
released November 1999) as a Debian package and found that it is
missing two features that I need. I contacted the package's author and
got no reply
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:54:00PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
> Running lintian, I get warning
> W: python-popy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/preinst
>
> What is a debhelper token? Where does one put it to fix the problem
> being warned about?
The debhelper token is #DEBHEL
(I sent this to Brian privately, and then realized that I could also
benefit from others on the list looking it over. Not to mention that
it's a good program that you ought to try out anyway! :-)
* Brian Russo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 06:42:11PM -0800, Joshua Haberman
Running lintian, I get warning
W: python-popy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/preinst
What is a debhelper token? Where does one put it to fix the problem
being warned about?
Thanks
Jim Penny
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:54:00PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
> Running lintian, I get warning
> W: python-popy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/preinst
>
> What is a debhelper token? Where does one put it to fix the problem
> being warned about?
The debhelper token is #DEBHE
Running lintian, I get warning
W: python-popy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/preinst
What is a debhelper token? Where does one put it to fix the problem
being warned about?
Thanks
Jim Penny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:37:00AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Although the build dir of my package (tkman) does not contain a usr/doc dir,
> I
> do get that dir after installation.
> Can I be assured that I have fulfilled all my duties about not installing
> anything in /usr/doc? According to
Although the build dir of my package (tkman) does not contain a usr/doc dir, I
do get that dir after installation.
Can I be assured that I have fulfilled all my duties about not installing
anything in /usr/doc? According to lintian there are no problems with the
package.
--
Sha
> Why can't you just have the link inside the .deb created correctly by
> the make install? Or am I missing something?
No, I guess I was running with the mentality that there was this fabulous
tool for creating symbolic links according to the standard and thus I should
use it. :)
I think I wi
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:37:00AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Although the build dir of my package (tkman) does not contain a usr/doc dir, I
> do get that dir after installation.
> Can I be assured that I have fulfilled all my duties about not installing
> anything in /usr/doc? According to li
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:22:07PM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi. I am packaging an application for which the original source installs
> itself all into the same directory. In order to comply with the FHS, I have
> split the application into pieces beneath /usr/lib, /usr/share and /usr/bin.
Although the build dir of my package (tkman) does not contain a usr/doc dir, I
do get that dir after installation.
Can I be assured that I have fulfilled all my duties about not installing
anything in /usr/doc? According to lintian there are no problems with the
package.
--
Sh
> Why can't you just have the link inside the .deb created correctly by
> the make install? Or am I missing something?
No, I guess I was running with the mentality that there was this fabulous
tool for creating symbolic links according to the standard and thus I should
use it. :)
I think I w
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:22:07PM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi. I am packaging an application for which the original source installs
> itself all into the same directory. In order to comply with the FHS, I have
> split the application into pieces beneath /usr/lib, /usr/share and /usr/bin.
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:22:07PM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi. I am packaging an application for which the original source installs
> itself all into the same directory. In order to comply with the FHS, I have
> split the application into pieces beneath /usr/lib, /usr/share and /usr/bin.
>
Hi. I am packaging an application for which the original source installs
itself all into the same directory. In order to comply with the FHS, I have
split the application into pieces beneath /usr/lib, /usr/share and /usr/bin.
So the application can find data where it expects to, I am making
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 01:22:07PM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi. I am packaging an application for which the original source installs
> itself all into the same directory. In order to comply with the FHS, I have
> split the application into pieces beneath /usr/lib, /usr/share and /usr/bin.
Hi. I am packaging an application for which the original source installs
itself all into the same directory. In order to comply with the FHS, I have
split the application into pieces beneath /usr/lib, /usr/share and /usr/bin.
So the application can find data where it expects to, I am making
Aubin Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1) I'm currently packing snoopy, it's an execve logger, it overrides
>the default execve behaviour in libc, with an LD_PRELOAD, and logs all
>executed commands. Anyhow, the upstream version installs into /lib,
>since it's for libc.. however, does it go there i
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 03:54:13AM -0600, taral wrote:
> Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the
> announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it.
I just realized that that's really ambiguous. I updated it, but I'm not
a maintainer yet, so I can't upload it
Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the
announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
"Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity."
pgpfnWVhgQctu.pgp
Description:
Aubin Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1) I'm currently packing snoopy, it's an execve logger, it overrides
>the default execve behaviour in libc, with an LD_PRELOAD, and logs all
>executed commands. Anyhow, the upstream version installs into /lib,
>since it's for libc.. however, does it go there
Today, Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want someone's advice how to check detached pgp signatures in gnus,
> like ones mutt create. Mailcrypt info tells it is not able to handle
> them.
Check out Oort gnus from CVS (It's usually quite stable, and bugs are
usually fixed in a mat
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 03:54:13AM -0600, taral wrote:
> Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the
> announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it.
I just realized that that's really ambiguous. I updated it, but I'm not
a maintainer yet, so I can't upload i
Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the
announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
"Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity."
PGP signature
> 1) I'm currently packing snoopy, it's an execve logger, it overrides
> the default execve behaviour in libc, with an LD_PRELOAD, and logs all
> executed commands. Anyhow, the upstream version installs into /lib,
> since it's for libc.. however, does it go there in a deb or into
> /usr/lib? It's n
Hi,
Actually, I lied, one of my two questions is about libraries, but I
have two questions.
1) I'm currently packing snoopy, it's an execve logger, it overrides
the default execve behaviour in libc, with an LD_PRELOAD, and logs all
executed commands. Anyhow, the upstream version installs into /li
Today, Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want someone's advice how to check detached pgp signatures in gnus,
> like ones mutt create. Mailcrypt info tells it is not able to handle
> them.
Check out Oort gnus from CVS (It's usually quite stable, and bugs are
usually fixed in a ma
Hi,
Just forwarding my ITP to see if anyone would be willing to sponsor me.
The package is all done, and can be downloaded from
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~edorla/debian/ . Thanks.
- Forwarded message from Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:07:06 -0500
From: Eric Do
29 matches
Mail list logo
