Re: dh_shlibdeps generates dependency on uninstalled library

2001-01-16 Thread Sudhakar Chandra
Matt Zimmerman proclaimed: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:00PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote: > > dh_shlibdeps in my debian/rules seems to generate a dependency on a package > > that is not even installed on my system. > What is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libaspell*.shlibs? D'oh! Thanks. S. -- Len

Re: dh_shlibdeps generates dependency on uninstalled library

2001-01-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:00PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote: > Hi, > > dh_shlibdeps in my debian/rules seems to generate a dependency on a package > that is not even installed on my system. What is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libaspell*.shlibs? -- - mdz

dh_shlibdeps generates dependency on uninstalled library

2001-01-16 Thread Sudhakar Chandra
Hi, dh_shlibdeps in my debian/rules seems to generate a dependency on a package that is not even installed on my system. % pwd /u/thaths/local-build/gaspell/0.30/gaspell-0.30 % ldd ./gaspell | grep aspell libaspell.so.8 => /usr/lib/libaspell.so.8 (0x40018000) % dpkg --info ../gaspell_0.

Re: dh_shlibdeps generates dependency on uninstalled library

2001-01-16 Thread Sudhakar Chandra
Matt Zimmerman proclaimed: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:00PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote: > > dh_shlibdeps in my debian/rules seems to generate a dependency on a package > > that is not even installed on my system. > What is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libaspell*.shlibs? D'oh! Thanks. S. -- Le

Re: dh_shlibdeps generates dependency on uninstalled library

2001-01-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:00PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandra wrote: > Hi, > > dh_shlibdeps in my debian/rules seems to generate a dependency on a package > that is not even installed on my system. What is in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libaspell*.shlibs? -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

dh_shlibdeps generates dependency on uninstalled library

2001-01-16 Thread Sudhakar Chandra
Hi, dh_shlibdeps in my debian/rules seems to generate a dependency on a package that is not even installed on my system. % pwd /u/thaths/local-build/gaspell/0.30/gaspell-0.30 % ldd ./gaspell | grep aspell libaspell.so.8 => /usr/lib/libaspell.so.8 (0x40018000) % dpkg --info ../gaspell_0

Re: (long reply) Re: NM saga (all of it - Joey, this means you)

2001-01-16 Thread Daniel Stone
> ++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone: > > Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to spe= > ak > > a non-positive word against so-called "senior developers" because they're > > just little, unimportant NMs.=20 > > Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do y

Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball

2001-01-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:00:11PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that I use > > cvs-buildpackage to make builds easier; if I have to futz about > > copying the old .tar.gz into place it could be a little inconvenient, > > but it's much better

Re: New-maintainer - STOP THAT SHIT

2001-01-16 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:37:21PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > If he has root access on his Suse box, I think a chroot Debian > environment might work out if he's careful. Good point. If his work allows it.. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: (long reply) Re: NM saga (all of it - Joey, this means you)

2001-01-16 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:03:43PM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > And democracy is: > -- you have more money -- you have more power (not rights). This is capitalism, not democracy. In Debian, capitalism has no place, as there is no currency, and we don't exchange anything. We only contribute an

How to handle linked packages one of which is likely to cause breakage?

2001-01-16 Thread jpenny
I have recently become a maintainer. I have volunteered with upstream to become package manager, but not yet ITA'd PoPy and ZPopyDA. I can package these, they are small easy to package programs. But, here is the problem. PoPy is a database adapter that allows access to PostgreSQL. As such, it

Re: (long reply) Re: NM saga (all of it - Joey, this means you)

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone: > Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to speak > a non-positive word against so-called "senior developers" because they're > just little, unimportant NMs. Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do you mean by ``aren'

Re: (long reply) Re: NM saga (all of it - Joey, this means you)

2001-01-16 Thread Daniel Stone
> ++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone: > > Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to spe= > ak > > a non-positive word against so-called "senior developers" because they're > > just little, unimportant NMs.=20 > > Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do

Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball

2001-01-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:00:11PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that I use > > cvs-buildpackage to make builds easier; if I have to futz about > > copying the old .tar.gz into place it could be a little inconvenient, > > but it's much bette

Re: New-maintainer - STOP THAT SHIT

2001-01-16 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:37:21PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > If he has root access on his Suse box, I think a chroot Debian > environment might work out if he's careful. Good point. If his work allows it.. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To

Re: (long reply) Re: NM saga (all of it - Joey, this means you)

2001-01-16 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:03:43PM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > And democracy is: > -- you have more money -- you have more power (not rights). This is capitalism, not democracy. In Debian, capitalism has no place, as there is no currency, and we don't exchange anything. We only contribute a

How to handle linked packages one of which is likely to cause breakage?

2001-01-16 Thread jpenny
I have recently become a maintainer. I have volunteered with upstream to become package manager, but not yet ITA'd PoPy and ZPopyDA. I can package these, they are small easy to package programs. But, here is the problem. PoPy is a database adapter that allows access to PostgreSQL. As such, i

Re: (long reply) Re: NM saga (all of it - Joey, this means you)

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
++ 16/01/01 01:41 +1100 - Daniel Stone: > Enter Debian, 2001. Democracy. (Yeah, my arse). NMs aren't allowed to speak > a non-positive word against so-called "senior developers" because they're > just little, unimportant NMs. Did anyone moderated you from debian-devel? What do you mean by ``aren

Re: New-maintainer - STOP THAT SHIT

2001-01-16 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:30:59PM +0100, Eric VB wrote: > > At the moment, I live 2000 km from home, I don't have a Debian system at ha > nd, > > and at work, I'm only allowed to use Suse, other distribution is prohibited > . > > > > I'm /home-less and I'm not rich enoug

things getting worse was: Getting my gpg-key into the keyring

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Baumann
Hi! I just got me the keyring package from woody. The changelog lists my gpg key as added but the keyring doesn't contain it. I filed a bug report against debian-keyring because of that. Christoph -- * Christoph Baumann * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New-maintainer - STOP THAT SHIT

2001-01-16 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:30:59PM +0100, Eric VB wrote: > > At the moment, I live 2000 km from home, I don't have a Debian system at ha > nd, > > and at work, I'm only allowed to use Suse, other distribution is prohibited > . > > > > I'm /home-less and I'm not rich enou

Re: Getting my gpg-key into the keyring

2001-01-16 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
Quoting Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010116 15:21]: > Hi! Hi Christoph, > I sent the key to keyring-maint with an e-mail signed with my pgp-key. > Now I sent the key to keyring.debian.org and a note to keyring-maint. keyring.d.o only accepts pre-existing keys to be updated > Nothing h

Getting my gpg-key into the keyring

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Baumann
Hi! I have the following problem: My pgp-key is already in the keyring. In June 2000 I created a gpg-key and got it signed by several developers at LinuxTag and LSM Bordeaux. I sent the key to keyring-maint with an e-mail signed with my pgp-key. Nothing happened. In August 2000 I did the same aga

things getting worse was: Getting my gpg-key into the keyring

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Baumann
Hi! I just got me the keyring package from woody. The changelog lists my gpg key as added but the keyring doesn't contain it. I filed a bug report against debian-keyring because of that. Christoph -- * Christoph Baumann * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Getting my gpg-key into the keyring

2001-01-16 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
Quoting Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010116 15:21]: > Hi! Hi Christoph, > I sent the key to keyring-maint with an e-mail signed with my pgp-key. > Now I sent the key to keyring.debian.org and a note to keyring-maint. keyring.d.o only accepts pre-existing keys to be updated > Nothing

Getting my gpg-key into the keyring

2001-01-16 Thread Christoph Baumann
Hi! I have the following problem: My pgp-key is already in the keyring. In June 2000 I created a gpg-key and got it signed by several developers at LinuxTag and LSM Bordeaux. I sent the key to keyring-maint with an e-mail signed with my pgp-key. Nothing happened. In August 2000 I did the same ag

Re: New-maintainer - STOP THAT SHIT

2001-01-16 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote: > ** On Jan 15, Hamish Moffatt scribbled: > > No, Debian (a software project) is about developing an OS, not > > about providing access to machines. The machines are only a tool > > for developing the distribution. > yes, but you can'

Re: New-maintainer - STOP THAT SHIT

2001-01-16 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote: > ** On Jan 15, Hamish Moffatt scribbled: > > No, Debian (a software project) is about developing an OS, not > > about providing access to machines. The machines are only a tool > > for developing the distribution. > yes, but you can