I've got three packages which need to be uploaded ready with a new
version, distributed-net, lxdoom, and djtools (which I've adopted.)
However, I'm not yet an official debian developer (still waiting on my
AM.) So, if someone could upload the packages at
http://gemini.woot.net/~hosehead/packages
it
Tollef Fog Heen:
> So, unless it's dependant on other buggy packages, or you get any RC
> bugs, it will go into testing.
Well, what I'm curious about is why only 1.2 is in testing, 1.4 was in
woody since a couple of months before testing was introduced.
Does this stuff require that the package
* peter karlsson
| 2.0 is from November last year, and should be good enough to have
| gone into testing, why hasn't it?
Dunno, but you can check the status on
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/update_excuses.html , as you
probably know.
| (2.0.1 fixes the only
| bugreport on it and was releas
I've got three packages which need to be uploaded ready with a new
version, distributed-net, lxdoom, and djtools (which I've adopted.)
However, I'm not yet an official debian developer (still waiting on my
AM.) So, if someone could upload the packages at
http://gemini.woot.net/~hosehead/packages
i
It is possible that your package is being held up by problems in some
package on which it depends. Of course, there are other possibilities as
well :)
Britton Kerin
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I can't really figure out how testing works, since one of my packages
> (tur
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:33:17PM +1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> I've just built a new version of byacc that way, and the .changes and
> .dsc file look correct, but I suppose the real test is whether dinstall
> will be happy.
You can logon to auric and run 'dinstall -n ' on the
package to se
Hi!
I can't really figure out how testing works, since one of my packages
(turqstat) currently has the very obsolete version 1.2 (same as in
potato) in testing, whereas it after that has been releases 1.3, 1.4,
2.0 and 2.0.1. 2.0 is from November last year, and should be good
enough to have gone i
Joey Hess:
> There is one wrinkle: If your package previously used suidmanager, and
> you convert it to not, you should make it Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50).
> (The details of why are a little messy; see earlier discussion on
> debian-devel.)
A program I packaged (jwhois, I am taking over mai
It is possible that your package is being held up by problems in some
package on which it depends. Of course, there are other possibilities as
well :)
Britton Kerin
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I can't really figure out how testing works, since one of my packages
> (tu
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:33:17PM +1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> I've just built a new version of byacc that way, and the .changes and
> .dsc file look correct, but I suppose the real test is whether dinstall
> will be happy.
You can logon to auric and run 'dinstall -n ' on the
package to s
Hi!
I can't really figure out how testing works, since one of my packages
(turqstat) currently has the very obsolete version 1.2 (same as in
potato) in testing, whereas it after that has been releases 1.3, 1.4,
2.0 and 2.0.1. 2.0 is from November last year, and should be good
enough to have gone
Joey Hess:
> There is one wrinkle: If your package previously used suidmanager, and
> you convert it to not, you should make it Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50).
> (The details of why are a little messy; see earlier discussion on
> debian-devel.)
A program I packaged (jwhois, I am taking over ma
Daniel Glassey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hullo, I know about the sponsorship page and have posted to it so
> this is just a headsup because I don't know how often people read it
> and I'm in the NM queue and my AM has asked me to post here.
>
> I've packaged a couple of bible study programs
Hullo, I know about the sponsorship page and have posted to it so
this is just a headsup because I don't know how often people read it
and I'm in the NM queue and my AM has asked me to post here.
I've packaged a couple of bible study programs and the library used
by them and am in the middle o
Daniel Glassey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hullo, I know about the sponsorship page and have posted to it so
> this is just a headsup because I don't know how often people read it
> and I'm in the NM queue and my AM has asked me to post here.
>
> I've packaged a couple of bible study program
Hullo, I know about the sponsorship page and have posted to it so
this is just a headsup because I don't know how often people read it
and I'm in the NM queue and my AM has asked me to post here.
I've packaged a couple of bible study programs and the library used
by them and am in the middle
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:59:53AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
>
> The #PACKAGE# lines above are from the example scripts in
> /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian*/rules if you debianize a source
> package by running dh_make, #PACKAGE# will be replaced with the package
> name. If you just copy the
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:59:53AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
>
> The #PACKAGE# lines above are from the example scripts in
> /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian*/rules if you debianize a source
> package by running dh_make, #PACKAGE# will be replaced with the package
> name. If you just copy th
18 matches
Mail list logo
