Hi,
Apologies in advance if this is the wrong list.
We are building a repository of deb packages optimised for i686 (Celeron etc)
as we found significant performance gains were achieved when we did this with
that "other" kind of package, before we saw the light and switched to Debian.
To do th
> commonc++ is kinda good, but not that good :>
>
I'm sure the CommonC++ devel list would be *very* interested in
knowing what the major drawbacks you have found are. Anything in particular?
-Rich
Patrick Schnorbus wrote:
>
> thanx, but the relevant functions that also are in CommomC++ i´ve already
> implemented :-)
> The needed features are too specifiy, I think.
commonc++ is kinda good, but not that good :>
i'm doing something that compiles "right out of box" for both
GNU/g++ and Win32/
Hi,
Apologies in advance if this is the wrong list.
We are building a repository of deb packages optimised for i686 (Celeron etc) as we
found significant performance gains were achieved when we did this with that "other"
kind of package, before we saw the light and switched to Debian.
To do t
> commonc++ is kinda good, but not that good :>
>
I'm sure the CommonC++ devel list would be *very* interested in
knowing what the major drawbacks you have found are. Anything in particular?
-Rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Patrick Schnorbus wrote:
>
> thanx, but the relevant functions that also are in CommomC++ i´ve already
> implemented :-)
> The needed features are too specifiy, I think.
commonc++ is kinda good, but not that good :>
i'm doing something that compiles "right out of box" for both
GNU/g++ and Win32
Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When should i use 'Build-Depends-Indep' instead of 'Build-Depends'?
>
>should Build-Depends-Indep be used for Dependencies on
>*_all.deb-Packages, or for Dependencies which were the same on all
>Debian-Architectures?
Build-Depends-Indep should be used for
Hi.
When should i use 'Build-Depends-Indep' instead of 'Build-Depends'?
should Build-Depends-Indep be used for Dependencies on
*_all.deb-Packages, or for Dependencies which were the same on all
Debian-Architectures?
Example:
should i set:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 2), libncurses-dev, xlib6g
Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When should i use 'Build-Depends-Indep' instead of 'Build-Depends'?
>
>should Build-Depends-Indep be used for Dependencies on
>*_all.deb-Packages, or for Dependencies which were the same on all
>Debian-Architectures?
Build-Depends-Indep should be used for
Hi.
When should i use 'Build-Depends-Indep' instead of 'Build-Depends'?
should Build-Depends-Indep be used for Dependencies on
*_all.deb-Packages, or for Dependencies which were the same on all
Debian-Architectures?
Example:
should i set:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 2), libncurses-dev, xlib6
thanx, but the relevant functions that also are in CommomC++ i´ve already
implemented :-)
The needed features are too specifiy, I think.
Patrick
Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2000 14:44 schrieb Rich Bodo:
> Have you checked out CommonC++? There are homepages on
> http://www.gnu.org and sourceforg
Have you checked out CommonC++? There are homepages on
http://www.gnu.org and sourceforge. A lot of CGI stuff is already in
there. It might be a good place to start, or at least share ideas, as
there really aren't all that many C++ gurus around.
-Rich
> I need help! I am programming a CGI-Lib
thanx, but the relevant functions that also are in CommomC++ i´ve already
implemented :-)
The needed features are too specifiy, I think.
Patrick
Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2000 14:44 schrieb Rich Bodo:
> Have you checked out CommonC++? There are homepages on
> http://www.gnu.org and sourcefor
Have you checked out CommonC++? There are homepages on
http://www.gnu.org and sourceforge. A lot of CGI stuff is already in
there. It might be a good place to start, or at least share ideas, as
there really aren't all that many C++ gurus around.
-Rich
> I need help! I am programming a CGI-Li
> In Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:48:48 -0500 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cum veritate scripsit :
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've applied as new mantainer a few days ago.
> > I haven't AM yet.
> >
> > Can I send an ITA in my current status?
>
> I don't know the general concensus about this (som
> In Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:48:48 -0500 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cum veritate scripsit :
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've applied as new mantainer a few days ago.
> > I haven't AM yet.
> >
> > Can I send an ITA in my current status?
>
> I don't know the general concensus about this (som
16 matches
Mail list logo
