Developers for C++ CGI-Library needed!

2000-12-27 Thread Patrick Schnorbus
Hi folks, I need help! I am programming a CGI-Library in C++ under the terms of the GNU LGPL. I need some developers who are interested to help! Please contact me and visit http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcppgi/ Thanx and regards, Patrick

Developers for C++ CGI-Library needed!

2000-12-27 Thread Patrick Schnorbus
Hi folks, I need help! I am programming a CGI-Library in C++ under the terms of the GNU LGPL. I need some developers who are interested to help! Please contact me and visit http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcppgi/ Thanx and regards, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: renaming packages (was: Bug#80573: should replace grafix)

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi idalton! On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I used a Provides: statement to solve a similar problem cropping up in > dselect on my system. What if you add > Provides: grafix > to your package, and see if that works. > I'm not sure about having a new package providing an older, obs

Re: renaming packages (was: Bug#80573: should replace grafix)

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi idalton! On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I used a Provides: statement to solve a similar problem cropping up in > dselect on my system. What if you add > Provides: grafix > to your package, and see if that works. > I'm not sure about having a new package providing an older, ob

Re: renaming packages (was: Bug#80573: should replace grafix)

2000-12-27 Thread idalton
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:58:02PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > Are you sure that grafix1 and grafix-dev do not have any files in > > common? If yes, your suggestion would be alright. > > yes, fine :) > > > > Will "apt-get upgrade" wor

Re: renaming packages (was: Bug#80573: should replace grafix)

2000-12-27 Thread idalton
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:58:02PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > Are you sure that grafix1 and grafix-dev do not have any files in > > common? If yes, your suggestion would be alright. > > yes, fine :) > > > > Will "apt-get upgrade" wo

renaming packages (was: Bug#80573: should replace grafix)

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi! On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote: > Are you sure that grafix1 and grafix-dev do not have any files in > common? If yes, your suggestion would be alright. yes, fine :) > > Will "apt-get upgrade" work if the new package only has > > | Replaces: foo > > | Conflicts: foo > > ioe, will

Awaiting DAM Approval

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
It's been more than a month, when is that supposed to occur? I would be needing an account soon. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

renaming packages (was: Bug#80573: should replace grafix)

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi! On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote: > Are you sure that grafix1 and grafix-dev do not have any files in > common? If yes, your suggestion would be alright. yes, fine :) > > Will "apt-get upgrade" work if the new package only has > > | Replaces: foo > > | Conflicts: foo > > ioe, will

Awaiting DAM Approval

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural (exa)
It's been more than a month, when is that supposed to occur? I would be needing an account soon. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a