Re: Some packages to give away

2000-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > > Easy packages (good for new maintainers): > > xearth > > I would like to take this one if anyone does not take it. It's yours. > I am very near a new maintainer (perhaps in the last stage > of new maintainer process, awaiting for DAM approval) but

Re: Some packages to give away

2000-11-25 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Some packages to give away Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:01:03 +0100 (CET) > Easy packages (good for new maintainers): > xearth I would like to take this one if anyone does not take it. I am very near a new maintainer (perhaps in the last stage of new

Re: Build problem with `debuild -rsudo' and LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2000-11-25 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 01:37:51AM +, Steve Dobson wrote: > The make files use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to pick up the libraries that have just > been built. > However, as I run `debuild -rsudo', the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is of course ignored > as the > building is being performed as root (why? -- isn't th

Re: Some packages to give away

2000-11-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > > Easy packages (good for new maintainers): > > xearth > > I would like to take this one if anyone does not take it. It's yours. > I am very near a new maintainer (perhaps in the last stage > of new maintainer process, awaiting for DAM approval) bu

Re: Some packages to give away

2000-11-25 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Some packages to give away Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:01:03 +0100 (CET) > Easy packages (good for new maintainers): > xearth I would like to take this one if anyone does not take it. I am very near a new maintainer (perhaps in the last stage of ne

Re: Build problem with `debuild -rsudo' and LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2000-11-25 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 01:37:51AM +, Steve Dobson wrote: > The make files use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to pick up the libraries that have just been >built. > However, as I run `debuild -rsudo', the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is of course ignored as the > building is being performed as root (why? -- isn't this

Re: Bug#77840: whatis problem in wml manpages

2000-11-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:18:26PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > > mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse > > > > for wml_aux_linklint(1) failed > > > > > > i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea how to fix this bug. > > > It appears that previous Debia

Re: Bug#77840: whatis problem in wml manpages

2000-11-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:18:26PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > > mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse for >wml_aux_linklint(1) failed > > > > > > i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea how to fix this bug. > > > It appears that previous Debian main

Re: Bug#77840: whatis problem in wml manpages

2000-11-25 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:06:24AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:04:13AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse > > > for wml_aux_linklint(1) failed > > > > i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea ho

Re: Bug#77840: whatis problem in wml manpages

2000-11-25 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:06:24AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:04:13AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse for >wml_aux_linklint(1) failed > > > > i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea how to

Re: Build problem with `debuild -rsudo' and LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2000-11-25 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > trick for me for a while. Try it before filing the bug, because one would > have to code a lot of stuff to get around the need to build .debs as a > normal user (i.e.: non-root and not under fakeroot) AFAIK. Erk. I'm not fully awake yet, it seems.

Re: Build problem with `debuild -rsudo' and LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2000-11-25 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Steve Dobson wrote: > The make files use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to pick up the libraries that have just > been built. > However, as I run `debuild -rsudo', the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is of course ignored > as the > building is being performed as root (why? -- isn't this a bug?), and the

Re: Build problem with `debuild -rsudo' and LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2000-11-25 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > trick for me for a while. Try it before filing the bug, because one would > have to code a lot of stuff to get around the need to build .debs as a > normal user (i.e.: non-root and not under fakeroot) AFAIK. Erk. I'm not fully awake yet, it seems.

Re: Build problem with `debuild -rsudo' and LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2000-11-25 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Steve Dobson wrote: > The make files use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to pick up the libraries that have just been >built. > However, as I run `debuild -rsudo', the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is of course ignored as the > building is being performed as root (why? -- isn't this a bug?), and the exec