On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:04:13AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse for
> > wml_aux_linklint(1) failed
>
> i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea how to fix this bug.
> It appears that previous Debian maintainers added
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:18:15PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Package: wml
> Version: 2.0.6-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> for many wml manpages, mandb complains that:
>
> Updating index cache for path `/usr/share/man'. Wait...mandb: warning:
> /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_txt2html.1.gz:
I would like to provide the wine snapshots as debian packages.
THe builds are demanding, though (list is from the guy who did this before):
- about 4 Pentium-133 CPU-hours per build (between
1 and 7 builds per week),
- about 96MB of RAM,
- about 700MB of free disk space for the builds (these
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 05:40:48PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> I maintain distributed-net, which is created from multiple architectures
> of upstream binary-only files. The problem is, I also need to depend on
> another package, so on certain architectures (ie i386) ${shlibs:Depends}
> is empty, and o
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 01:04:13AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_linklint.1.gz: whatis parse for
>wml_aux_linklint(1) failed
>
> i am a new Debian developer, and have no idea how to fix this bug.
> It appears that previous Debian maintainers added so
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:18:15PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Package: wml
> Version: 2.0.6-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> for many wml manpages, mandb complains that:
>
> Updating index cache for path `/usr/share/man'. Wait...mandb: warning:
>/usr/share/man/man1/wml_aux_txt2html.1.gz:
I would like to provide the wine snapshots as debian packages.
THe builds are demanding, though (list is from the guy who did this before):
- about 4 Pentium-133 CPU-hours per build (between
1 and 7 builds per week),
- about 96MB of RAM,
- about 700MB of free disk space for the builds (these
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, zhaoway wrote:
> hi,
>
> should bug-fix-upload be a batch job? i.e. every upload
> fixes as many as possible bugs/lintian errors etc. ?
>
> or is it okay to upload for easy-fix-bug(s) while leave
> other maybe-difficult-but-obvious-bugs for the next upload?
It's OK if you can
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 05:40:48PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> I maintain distributed-net, which is created from multiple architectures
> of upstream binary-only files. The problem is, I also need to depend on
> another package, so on certain architectures (ie i386) ${shlibs:Depends}
> is empty, and
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:29:01PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> I guess I can try debian-x. It's just a hassle having to subscribe to 2
> dozen different mailing lists just to answer one question, that's all.
>
You can find the archives of all of the public lists at
http://lists.debian.org/
On 20001118T160237-0600, Clay Crouch wrote:
> Hmmm I seem to recall James Troup telling me that dinstall
> does the check automagically during install
It doesn't. However, some ftp-masters (presumably James included) use
a script that does this (but the script merely displays the output,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, zhaoway wrote:
> hi,
>
> should bug-fix-upload be a batch job? i.e. every upload
> fixes as many as possible bugs/lintian errors etc. ?
>
> or is it okay to upload for easy-fix-bug(s) while leave
> other maybe-difficult-but-obvious-bugs for the next upload?
It's OK if you ca
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:29:01PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> I guess I can try debian-x. It's just a hassle having to subscribe to 2
> dozen different mailing lists just to answer one question, that's all.
>
You can find the archives of all of the public lists at
http://lists.debian.org/
On 20001118T160237-0600, Clay Crouch wrote:
> Hmmm I seem to recall James Troup telling me that dinstall
> does the check automagically during install
It doesn't. However, some ftp-masters (presumably James included) use
a script that does this (but the script merely displays the output,
hi,
should bug-fix-upload be a batch job? i.e. every upload
fixes as many as possible bugs/lintian errors etc. ?
or is it okay to upload for easy-fix-bug(s) while leave
other maybe-difficult-but-obvious-bugs for the next upload?
thanks,
zw
hi,
should bug-fix-upload be a batch job? i.e. every upload
fixes as many as possible bugs/lintian errors etc. ?
or is it okay to upload for easy-fix-bug(s) while leave
other maybe-difficult-but-obvious-bugs for the next upload?
thanks,
zw
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:17:51AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:41:51PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > When I try to start X (using either startx or xdm, I didn't try xinit), it
> > > starts loading, and then the computer freezes up utterl
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:17:51AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:41:51PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > When I try to start X (using either startx or xdm, I didn't try xinit), it
> > > starts loading, and then the computer freezes up utter
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 08:38:42AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I tell a lie, there's another possibility. Check that the changelog
> names your source package correctly (i.e. by the same name as used in
> debian/control).
Thanx!!! Stupid me! Changed changelog, error changed it back, changed contro
Hi Carey and *:
Is there any software out there that can do CICS send and recieve? Err, lemme
qualify that... anything free that can build on a posix?
-Jim
---
Jim Lynch Finger for pgp key
as Laney College CIS admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.laney.edu/~jim/
as Debian developer:
I've been putting this off for a while, but I really need to do
something about the x3270 package that I maintain.
I took it over two years ago, meaning to sort out what the license
was, but there doesn't seem to be much chance of even getting a
license on it that allows it to be in non-free.
My
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
>Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>dpkg-gencontrol: error: source package has two conflicting values -
>>xemacs21 and gtk-xemacs21
>>dh_gencontrol: command returned error code
>[...]
>>When do dpkg-gencontrol say that there are conflicting values?
>
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 08:38:42AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I tell a lie, there's another possibility. Check that the changelog
> names your source package correctly (i.e. by the same name as used in
> debian/control).
Thanx!!! Stupid me! Changed changelog, error changed it back, changed contr
Hi Carey and *:
Is there any software out there that can do CICS send and recieve? Err, lemme
qualify that... anything free that can build on a posix?
-Jim
---
Jim Lynch Finger for pgp key
as Laney College CIS admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.laney.edu/~jim/
as Debian developer:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:49:03AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> [Moving to debian-mentors, where this should go.]
>
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >dpkg-gencontrol: error: source package has two conflicting values -
> >xemacs21 and gtk-xemacs21
> >dh_gencontrol: command returned erro
I've been putting this off for a while, but I really need to do
something about the x3270 package that I maintain.
I took it over two years ago, meaning to sort out what the license
was, but there doesn't seem to be much chance of even getting a
license on it that allows it to be in non-free.
My
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
>Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>dpkg-gencontrol: error: source package has two conflicting values -
>>xemacs21 and gtk-xemacs21
>>dh_gencontrol: command returned error code
>[...]
>>When do dpkg-gencontrol say that there are conflicting values?
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
