Re: Unlicensed code in upstream

2000-11-11 Thread Michael Moerz
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 10:13:37PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: [snip] > > In my opinion: > > I think you should find out (by asking upstream) whether their > licence includes the triangualization code or not. If the answer > is no then there is a problem: You can not package the software > and p

Re: Unlicensed code in upstream

2000-11-11 Thread Michael Moerz
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 10:13:37PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: [snip] > > In my opinion: > > I think you should find out (by asking upstream) whether their > licence includes the triangualization code or not. If the answer > is no then there is a problem: You can not package the software > and

Re: bugscan?

2000-11-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > i heard on debian-devel that there's a `bugscan'. is there any > > infomation? > > It is a periodic message listing critical bugs and it is sent out > on the debian-devel-archive mailing list (which is low volume, > and which you should be subscribed to

Big-endian

2000-11-11 Thread peter karlsson
Hi! Which of Debian's architectures are big-endian, and are there any machines online that I, as a Debian developer, can log in and test the software I maintain to see if it works properly on big-endian? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail acco

Re: bugscan?

2000-11-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > i heard on debian-devel that there's a `bugscan'. is there any > > infomation? > > It is a periodic message listing critical bugs and it is sent out > on the debian-devel-archive mailing list (which is low volume, > and which you should be subscribed to

Re: simply curious lintian messages

2000-11-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > Is anybody know what's wrong if lintian sings: > > defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 154 > (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) > defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian

simply curious lintian messages

2000-11-11 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
Is anybody know what's wrong if lintian sings: defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 154 (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 216 (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) ?

XFree4.01 building on potato does not work

2000-11-11 Thread Michael Meding
Hi all, I tried a apt-get source xfree --compile on a potato where the xfree 4.01 was taken from woody (or dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc for that matter in the xfree-4.01 directory). So far it went well, it showed "full build of XFree86 complete" after that it went on with the package building process

Big-endian

2000-11-11 Thread peter karlsson
Hi! Which of Debian's architectures are big-endian, and are there any machines online that I, as a Debian developer, can log in and test the software I maintain to see if it works properly on big-endian? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail acc

Re: simply curious lintian messages

2000-11-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > Is anybody know what's wrong if lintian sings: > > defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 154 > (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) > defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintia

simply curious lintian messages

2000-11-11 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
Is anybody know what's wrong if lintian sings: defined(@array) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 154 (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?) defined(%hash) is deprecated at /usr/share/lintian/checks/perl line 216 (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)

XFree4.01 building on potato does not work

2000-11-11 Thread Michael Meding
Hi all, I tried a apt-get source xfree --compile on a potato where the xfree 4.01 was taken from woody (or dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc for that matter in the xfree-4.01 directory). So far it went well, it showed "full build of XFree86 complete" after that it went on with the package building proces

Re: wrong dependency from dh_shlibdeps on xiterm+thai-1.03-1

2000-11-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On my woody i386 box, when I try to build xiterm+thai-1.03-1 I've got the > > wrong dependency from dh_libdeps. If I have xlib6 (3.3.6-13) installed, I'll > > get the wrong dependency like > > > > Depends: libc6 (>=2.1.97), xlib6 (>=3.3.6-4), xlibs (>=4.

Re: wrong dependency from dh_shlibdeps on xiterm+thai-1.03-1

2000-11-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On my woody i386 box, when I try to build xiterm+thai-1.03-1 I've got the > > wrong dependency from dh_libdeps. If I have xlib6 (3.3.6-13) installed, I'll > > get the wrong dependency like > > > > Depends: libc6 (>=2.1.97), xlib6 (>=3.3.6-4), xlibs (>=4