RE: rpath (was Re: Two questions about policy)

> > Another thing you could do is to stuck the libs in a > subdirectory and have > > your postinst and postrm edit /etc/ld.so.conf. That sounds like the > > traditional way to me, but then that was before rpath... > > It's a little trickier than the way xaw3d handled it though. A > half-dozen pa

SDL and SDL_image

Hi, I have a little trouble with SDL_image which I maintain. I made two packages, libsdl-image1.0 and libsdl-image-dev. Until recently SDL_image was built with SDL1.0, the stable release. The current versions need SDL1.1, the unstable release. Unfortunately I built and uploaded SDL_image with that,

Re: What shall I package? Was: Re: sphinx

On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:46:16AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote: > Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and > programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs > to be packaged? :) I have uploaded a new Debian package to vestein.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.d

RE: rpath (was Re: Two questions about policy)

> > Another thing you could do is to stuck the libs in a > subdirectory and have > > your postinst and postrm edit /etc/ld.so.conf. That sounds like the > > traditional way to me, but then that was before rpath... > > It's a little trickier than the way xaw3d handled it though. A > half-dozen p

SDL and SDL_image

Hi, I have a little trouble with SDL_image which I maintain. I made two packages, libsdl-image1.0 and libsdl-image-dev. Until recently SDL_image was built with SDL1.0, the stable release. The current versions need SDL1.1, the unstable release. Unfortunately I built and uploaded SDL_image with that

Re: What shall I package? Was: Re: sphinx

On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:46:16AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote: > Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and > programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs > to be packaged? :) I have uploaded a new Debian package to vestein.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.