Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:04:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> It happens every time I build a package inside fakeroot (i.e. every time >> I build a package). > >Eww. Is the bug filed, with an appropriate severity? Yes, #64090 (I think it's noted somewhere

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:04:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> It happens every time I build a package inside fakeroot (i.e. every time >> I build a package). > >Eww. Is the bug filed, with an appropriate severity? Yes, #64090 (I think it's noted somewher

Re: how orig must orig.tar.gz be?

2000-09-19 Thread Falk Hueffner
Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 04:13:51PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > > I am packaging python-slang, and the upstream tarball contains > > precompiled binaries for linux, sparc-solaris and win32. Is it > > ok to remove the directory with the binaries fr

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:04:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > >> This is a known bug in fakeroot/dhlibdeps > > > >Exposed by mozilla (and related stuff) only? I presume it means you can't > >install galeon without having fakeroot installed already... yucks. > > It happens every time I build a pa

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:53:06PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Exposed by mozilla (and related stuff) only? I presume it means you can't > install galeon without having fakeroot installed already... yucks. The dependency isn't there, it just spits out spurious errors when *shlibdeps is run So n

Re: How to divide origial tarball?

2000-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:36:31PM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: >> Upstream version tarball consists of dictionary, scripts for finding >> words and X fonts to show transcription symbols. X fonts are non-free, >> and dictionary with scripts are GPL and all

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 03:34:26PM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote: >> This is a known bug in fakeroot/dhlibdeps > >Exposed by mozilla (and related stuff) only? I presume it means you can't >install galeon without having fakeroot installed already... yucks. It h

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 03:34:26PM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote: > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on > > > `debian/tmp/usr/bin/galeon-bin': `libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so > > > (0x40526000)' > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on > > > `debian/tm

Re: how orig must orig.tar.gz be?

2000-09-19 Thread Falk Hueffner
Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 04:13:51PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > > I am packaging python-slang, and the upstream tarball contains > > precompiled binaries for linux, sparc-solaris and win32. Is it > > ok to remove the directory with the binaries f

Re: How to divide origial tarball?

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:36:31PM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > Upstream version tarball consists of dictionary, scripts for finding > words and X fonts to show transcription symbols. X fonts are non-free, > and dictionary with scripts are GPL and all are in _one_ tarball. Is > it ok if I devi

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:27:43PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:48:18AM +0200, Daniele Cruciani wrote: > > dh_shlibdeps -l/usr/lib/mozilla > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on > > `debian/tmp/usr/bin/galeon-bin': ` libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:48:18AM +0200, Daniele Cruciani wrote: > dh_shlibdeps -l/usr/lib/mozilla > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on > `debian/tmp/usr/bin/galeon-bin': `libgtkembedmoz.so => > /usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so (0x40505000)' > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:04:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > >> This is a known bug in fakeroot/dhlibdeps > > > >Exposed by mozilla (and related stuff) only? I presume it means you can't > >install galeon without having fakeroot installed already... yucks. > > It happens every time I build a p

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:53:06PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Exposed by mozilla (and related stuff) only? I presume it means you can't > install galeon without having fakeroot installed already... yucks. The dependency isn't there, it just spits out spurious errors when *shlibdeps is run So

Re: How to divide origial tarball?

2000-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:36:31PM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: >> Upstream version tarball consists of dictionary, scripts for finding >> words and X fonts to show transcription symbols. X fonts are non-free, >> and dictionary with scripts are GPL and al

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Colin Watson
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 03:34:26PM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote: >> This is a known bug in fakeroot/dhlibdeps > >Exposed by mozilla (and related stuff) only? I presume it means you can't >install galeon without having fakeroot installed already... yucks. It

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 03:34:26PM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote: > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on >`debian/tmp/usr/bin/galeon-bin': `libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so >(0x40526000)' > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on >`debian/tmp/usr/bin/gale

Re: How to divide origial tarball?

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:36:31PM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > Upstream version tarball consists of dictionary, scripts for finding > words and X fonts to show transcription symbols. X fonts are non-free, > and dictionary with scripts are GPL and all are in _one_ tarball. Is > it ok if I dev

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Franklin Belew
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:27:43PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:48:18AM +0200, Daniele Cruciani wrote: > > dh_shlibdeps -l/usr/lib/mozilla > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on >`debian/tmp/usr/bin/galeon-bin': ` libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so

Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)

2000-09-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:48:18AM +0200, Daniele Cruciani wrote: > dh_shlibdeps -l/usr/lib/mozilla > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown output from ldd on `debian/tmp/usr/bin/galeon-bin': >`libgtkembedmoz.so => /usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so (0x40505000)' > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unk

How to divide origial tarball?

2000-09-19 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Hello! I want to package package dictionary with russian dictionary. Upstream version tarball consists of dictionary, scripts for finding words and X fonts to show transcription symbols. X fonts are non-free, and dictionary with scripts are GPL and all are in _one_ tarball. Is it ok if I devide ta

argh! [was: Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)]

2000-09-19 Thread Daniele Cruciani
I miss that section ... Hi, it was too late and i had the impression that something is wrong in debhelper script, I'm sorry .. According to packaging manual I've to use debian/shlibs.local file for that job, while mozilla maintainer don't "fix" that. I'm wrong? and if so i should fill a bug rep

How to divide origial tarball?

2000-09-19 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Hello! I want to package package dictionary with russian dictionary. Upstream version tarball consists of dictionary, scripts for finding words and X fonts to show transcription symbols. X fonts are non-free, and dictionary with scripts are GPL and all are in _one_ tarball. Is it ok if I devide t

argh! [was: Re: dh_shlibdeps : strange message (??)]

2000-09-19 Thread Daniele Cruciani
I miss that section ... Hi, it was too late and i had the impression that something is wrong in debhelper script, I'm sorry .. According to packaging manual I've to use debian/shlibs.local file for that job, while mozilla maintainer don't "fix" that. I'm wrong? and if so i should fill a bug re

Re: OT: Re: Sponsor's responsibilities

2000-09-19 Thread Steve Bowman
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 09:39:40PM -0700, Seth Cohn wrote: > Steve Bowman trying to find a good word to compliment debian-mentors: > > > Taking these items together, how about making up a really new word that > > is really Debianspeak? You could have debee and deber :-) OTOH, the > > best _word_