Re: need help with library package

2000-09-01 Thread Colin Watson
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:52:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: >> What non-text body? It was perfectly readable text enclosed in the >> PGP block. > >I hope this is a missconfigured Mutt then: > >> [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to vi

Re: need help with library package

2000-09-01 Thread Colin Watson
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:52:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: >> What non-text body? It was perfectly readable text enclosed in the >> PGP block. > >I hope this is a missconfigured Mutt then: > >> [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to v

Re: need help with library package

2000-09-01 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 2901T021132+0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > I hope this is a missconfigured Mutt then: > > > [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] > > and `this part' was empty. It happens with all his mails. I have to save the > message to a file and page it. Works fine with my

Re: need help with library package

2000-09-01 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 2901T021132+0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > I hope this is a missconfigured Mutt then: > > > [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] > > and `this part' was empty. It happens with all his mails. I have to save the > message to a file and page it. Works fine with m

Re: Request for advice

2000-09-01 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > > a graphical tool (text-editor plus fancy bits, usually). > emacs (I prefer emacs because there is a fine SGML mode, psgml, > which works fine for XML). I fail to see a contradiction there. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb e

Re: Request for advice

2000-09-01 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 29 August 2000, at 19 h 2, the keyboard of Roger Burton West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't yet seen anyone editing XML with anything except a graphical > tool (text-editor plus fancy bits, usually). You must be kidding. In the free software world, almost everybody types XML b

Re: Request for advice

2000-09-01 Thread Jens Schmalzing
Hi, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > > a graphical tool (text-editor plus fancy bits, usually). > emacs (I prefer emacs because there is a fine SGML mode, psgml, > which works fine for XML). I fail to see a contradiction there. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb

Re: Request for advice

2000-09-01 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 29 August 2000, at 19 h 2, the keyboard of Roger Burton West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't yet seen anyone editing XML with anything except a graphical > tool (text-editor plus fancy bits, usually). You must be kidding. In the free software world, almost everybody types XML