I suspect the error message is bogus -- I think in it's heart of
hearts, the system is really complaining about not having your public
key on file. At least that's what I think happened to me when I got a
similar message.
Jeff
Okay, I'm a brand spanking new maintainer, and I have (AFAIK) followed
the New Maintainer's Guide on how to create and upload a package. So
after I do the dupload step, I get this email:
-
PGP/GnuPG signature check failed on gforth_0.4.0-4_i386.changes
ERROR: Header line
Dennis Schoen wrote:
> > Since policy does not currently specify what return code an init script
> > should return if "start" is run and the daemon is already running, a simple
> > fix would be to detect the daemon is running, and just exit with a warning.
>
> Yes but that way, the changes made in
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:08:38PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The language is not at fault, the programmers who use it badly are.
>
> Especially the programmers who choose bad languages in the first place.
If there is such a thing, Perl is not
I suspect the error message is bogus -- I think in it's heart of
hearts, the system is really complaining about not having your public
key on file. At least that's what I think happened to me when I got a
similar message.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Okay, I'm a brand spanking new maintainer, and I have (AFAIK) followed
the New Maintainer's Guide on how to create and upload a package. So
after I do the dupload step, I get this email:
-
PGP/GnuPG signature check failed on gforth_0.4.0-4_i386.changes
ERROR: Header line
Dennis Schoen wrote:
> > Since policy does not currently specify what return code an init script
> > should return if "start" is run and the daemon is already running, a simple
> > fix would be to detect the daemon is running, and just exit with a warning.
>
> Yes but that way, the changes made i
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:08:38PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The language is not at fault, the programmers who use it badly are.
>
> Especially the programmers who choose bad languages in the first place.
If there is such a thing, Perl is no
back to business (was: a bit policy, a bit devel)
shall we stop this endless discussion, and do something productive?
(like debugging?)
Egon
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> The whole state debconf is best described as "prototype".
Well thank you so much for your observation. It's not true though.
> I'm not very
> experienced in perl, so I never saw a perl-program before that is so much
> less readable than a bad C-code.
>
> But I don't lik
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:08:38PM +0200, Marius Vollmer typed:
} Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
}
} > The language is not at fault, the programmers who use it badly are.
}
} Especially the programmers who choose bad languages in the first place.
No kidding. We should throw out C, C
back to business (was: a bit policy, a bit devel)
shall we stop this endless discussion, and do something productive?
(like debugging?)
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> The whole state debconf is best described as "prototype".
Well thank you so much for your observation. It's not true though.
> I'm not very
> experienced in perl, so I never saw a perl-program before that is so much
> less readable than a bad C-code.
>
> But I don't li
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:08:38PM +0200, Marius Vollmer typed:
} Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
}
} > The language is not at fault, the programmers who use it badly are.
}
} Especially the programmers who choose bad languages in the first place.
No kidding. We should throw out C,
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The language is not at fault, the programmers who use it badly are.
Especially the programmers who choose bad languages in the first place.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:52:41AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> The whole state debconf is best described as "prototype". I'm not very
> experienced in perl, so I never saw a perl-program before that is so much
> less readable than a bad C-code.
Perl can be readable or obfuscated. The language
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:15:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yeah, I hate perl. Its easy to create bugs and hard to fix them.
You can do that in any language. Perl is no different to C in that regard.
Recently I've been programming a lot in Tcl; too many inconsistencies
to be a good langua
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The language is not at fault, the programmers who use it badly are.
Especially the programmers who choose bad languages in the first place.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:52:41AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> The whole state debconf is best described as "prototype". I'm not very
> experienced in perl, so I never saw a perl-program before that is so much
> less readable than a bad C-code.
Perl can be readable or obfuscated. The languag
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:15:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Yeah, I hate perl. Its easy to create bugs and hard to fix them.
You can do that in any language. Perl is no different to C in that regard.
Recently I've been programming a lot in Tcl; too many inconsistencies
to be a good lang
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:00:46AM -0400, Steven R . Baker wrote:
> I changed the control files, did a dch -i, and stuff, and did
> dpkg-buildpackage and it didn't generate a new .changes file, just a
> .diff and a .dsc???
Do you have a gpg key with the exact ID in your Maintainer: field?
Send the
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Er, debconf includes its own web server. In 256 lines of perl.
> (Shittiest web server on earth too, btw.)
The whole state debconf is best described as "prototype". I'm not very
experienced in perl, so I never saw a perl-program before that is so much
less
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:00:46AM -0400, Steven R . Baker wrote:
> I changed the control files, did a dch -i, and stuff, and did
> dpkg-buildpackage and it didn't generate a new .changes file, just a
> .diff and a .dsc???
Do you have a gpg key with the exact ID in your Maintainer: field?
Send th
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Er, debconf includes its own web server. In 256 lines of perl.
> (Shittiest web server on earth too, btw.)
The whole state debconf is best described as "prototype". I'm not very
experienced in perl, so I never saw a perl-program before that is so much
les
24 matches
Mail list logo
