Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread An Thi-Nguyen Le
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:08:45AM -0700, J C Lawrence typed: } On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:34:41 +0800 } Peter Crystal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: } } >> > You should have a look at mutt. It handles gpg signing etc. } >> } >> Why bother? Mutt is so terribly inflexible compared to MH. I'm a bit out

Re: Kernel Recompile

2000-07-28 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:09:41AM -0600, Matthew wrote: > Please notify me if I am using the wrong subscription. Please use debian-user in the future. This list is for mentoring Debian developers. > I am attempting to figure out how to recompile my Kernel. Install package "kernel-package" and

Kernel Recompile

2000-07-28 Thread Matthew
Please notify me if I am using the wrong subscription.   I am attempting to figure out how to recompile my Kernel.  I am running Corel Linux (Debian) on a MSDos partition.  I have found alot of Documentation as to how to do this, but I don't have enough experience to know whether or not dsel

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:34:41 +0800 Peter Crystal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > You should have a look at mutt. It handles gpg signing etc. >> >> Why bother? Mutt is so terribly inflexible compared to MH. > out of curiousity, what does mh offer ? MH provides a base set of very low level ma

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread An Thi-Nguyen Le
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:08:45AM -0700, J C Lawrence typed: } On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:34:41 +0800 } Peter Crystal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: } } >> > You should have a look at mutt. It handles gpg signing etc. } >> } >> Why bother? Mutt is so terribly inflexible compared to MH. I'm a bit out

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Peter Crystal
> > You should have a look at mutt. It handles gpg signing etc. > > Why bother? Mutt is so terribly inflexible compared to MH. out of curiousity, what does mh offer ? I know mutt can be hacked around with pretty well. merely curious about what MH has to offer/ > > I'd recommend: > > 1) ge

Re: Kernel Recompile

2000-07-28 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:09:41AM -0600, Matthew wrote: > Please notify me if I am using the wrong subscription. Please use debian-user in the future. This list is for mentoring Debian developers. > I am attempting to figure out how to recompile my Kernel. Install package "kernel-package" and

Kernel Recompile

2000-07-28 Thread Matthew
Please notify me if I am using the wrong subscription.   I am attempting to figure out how to recompile my Kernel.  I am running Corel Linux (Debian) on a MSDos partition.  I have found alot of Documentation as to how to do this, but I don't have enough experience to know whether or not dsel

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:34:41 +0800 Peter Crystal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > You should have a look at mutt. It handles gpg signing etc. >> >> Why bother? Mutt is so terribly inflexible compared to MH. > out of curiousity, what does mh offer ? MH provides a base set of very low level m

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:15:13 + Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: >> I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am >> ready to post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign my >> message. I don't

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Peter Crystal
> > You should have a look at mutt. It handles gpg signing etc. > > Why bother? Mutt is so terribly inflexible compared to MH. out of curiousity, what does mh offer ? I know mutt can be hacked around with pretty well. merely curious about what MH has to offer/ > > I'd recommend: > > 1) g

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Buddha Buck
At 02:56 PM 7/28/00 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign m

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign my message. I don't > > see any gpg options to mh, a

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:15:13 + Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: >> I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am >> ready to post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign my >> message. I don't

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Buddha Buck
At 02:56 PM 7/28/00 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: >Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > > > > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > > > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign my message. I don't > > see any gpg options to mh,

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Christoph Baumann
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign my message. I don't > see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my scanned identification as You should

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-28 Thread Christoph Baumann
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign my message. I don't > see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my scanned identification as You should