On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:40:46PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The section is set by the override file of the ftp admins that overrides
> the settings of the maintainer. The previous version of tkman was in
> non-free, and the section doesn't change automatically in the override
> file if you chang
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Shaul Karl wrote:
> [02:13:00 tkman-2.1]$ grep Section debian/control -A 1
> Section: doc
> Priority: optional
> [02:13:04 tkman-2.1]$
>
> Isn't the above enough for having the local deb installed in main?
>
> dpkg insists that it is non-free.
>
> [02:13:59 /tmp]$ grep-sta
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:40:46PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The section is set by the override file of the ftp admins that overrides
> the settings of the maintainer. The previous version of tkman was in
> non-free, and the section doesn't change automatically in the override
> file if you chan
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Shaul Karl wrote:
> [02:13:00 tkman-2.1]$ grep Section debian/control -A 1
> Section: doc
> Priority: optional
> [02:13:04 tkman-2.1]$
>
> Isn't the above enough for having the local deb installed in main?
>
> dpkg insists that it is non-free.
>
> [02:13:59 /tmp]$ grep-st
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 03:22:26AM -0400, Dan Nguyen wrote:
> If you noticed that version 2 didn't get rejected. While trying to
> find a sig to verify that you were in the keyring. The dsc and
> changelog files for 1,3 and 4 aren't signed. Since they aren't signed
> they have been rejected. Ma
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:07:34AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I hope you can help me. I have a problem uploading my package. It's my
> first one so this might be quite easy to fix.
>
> I have uploaded the package already with dupload to ftp-master, and
> it's already there. But in the /REJEC
Hello!
I hope you can help me. I have a problem uploading my package. It's my
first one so this might be quite easy to fix.
I have uploaded the package already with dupload to ftp-master, and
it's already there. But in the /REJECT/ directory there is a
fancylogin_...reason file which sa
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 03:22:26AM -0400, Dan Nguyen wrote:
> If you noticed that version 2 didn't get rejected. While trying to
> find a sig to verify that you were in the keyring. The dsc and
> changelog files for 1,3 and 4 aren't signed. Since they aren't signed
> they have been rejected. M
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:07:34AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I hope you can help me. I have a problem uploading my package. It's my
> first one so this might be quite easy to fix.
>
> I have uploaded the package already with dupload to ftp-master, and
> it's already there. But in the /REJE
9 matches
Mail list logo
