Re: Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread James Troup
Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0400, Tommy Moore wrote: > > Hi. I'm trying to update gnupg on my debian 2.2 system with a new source > > tree that came out yesterday. [...] FWIW, I just uploaded gnupg 1.0.2-1 to non-us.debian.org's Incoming dire

Re: Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 12:45:42PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > The reason for the rejection of the manpage is obvious when you look > at the existing diff.gz file for gnupg_1.0.1-2 on frozen: > > http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/frozen/non-US/main/source/gnupg_1.0.1-2.diff.gz > >

Re: Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread James Troup
Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0400, Tommy Moore wrote: > > Hi. I'm trying to update gnupg on my debian 2.2 system with a new source > > tree that came out yesterday. [...] FWIW, I just uploaded gnupg 1.0.2-1 to non-us.debian.org's Incoming dir

Re: Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 12:45:42PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote: > The reason for the rejection of the manpage is obvious when you look > at the existing diff.gz file for gnupg_1.0.1-2 on frozen: > > >http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/dists/frozen/non-US/main/source/gnupg_1.0.1-2.diff.gz >

RE: Quiet upstreams

2000-07-13 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Do maintainers generally pass on maintaining things when upstream > is shown to be inactive or unresponsive? > depends on the app. I have passed a package to other people when the upstream and I could not work together. Other times people just fork the app. Sometimes, if you can join the

Re: Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread Gopal Narayanan
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0400, Tommy Moore wrote: > Hi. I'm trying to update gnupg on my debian 2.2 system with a new source > tree that came out yesterday. > > I read the gnu maintainers guide about updating packages and when I ran ^^^ > uupdate -u ../gnupg-1.0.2.tar.gz

RE: Quiet upstreams

2000-07-13 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Do maintainers generally pass on maintaining things when upstream > is shown to be inactive or unresponsive? > depends on the app. I have passed a package to other people when the upstream and I could not work together. Other times people just fork the app. Sometimes, if you can join the

Re: Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread Gopal Narayanan
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0400, Tommy Moore wrote: > Hi. I'm trying to update gnupg on my debian 2.2 system with a new source > tree that came out yesterday. > > I read the gnu maintainers guide about updating packages and when I ran ^^^ > uupdate -u ../gnupg-1.0.2.tar.g

Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread Tommy Moore
Hi. I'm trying to update gnupg on my debian 2.2 system with a new source tree that came out yesterday. I read the gnu maintainers guide about updating packages and when I ran uupdate -u ../gnupg-1.0.2.tar.gz When it did the patch the only thing that failed was the patching of the man page. Wha

Updating gnupg

2000-07-13 Thread Tommy Moore
Hi. I'm trying to update gnupg on my debian 2.2 system with a new source tree that came out yesterday. I read the gnu maintainers guide about updating packages and when I ran uupdate -u ../gnupg-1.0.2.tar.gz When it did the patch the only thing that failed was the patching of the man page. Wh