Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine ?

On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 11:30:07AM -0700, Rick Younie wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>I get all my nm-admin mail through the gated nm-discuss list, and it > >>has *not* been quiet. Please check your subscription details if you > >>are not receivin

Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine ?

On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 11:30:07AM -0700, Rick Younie wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>I get all my nm-admin mail through the gated nm-discuss list, and it > >>has *not* been quiet. Please check your subscription details if you > >>are not receivi

Re: Usage of this list.

Michael Beattie wrote: > > Would those posting 'Re: .*NM.*' *PLEASE* go and reread the description of > this mailing list. > Whoops. nm-discuss seems to be fubared. Is there another list to talk about the nm process until it gets fixed or moved to d.o? Rick

Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine ?

Colin Watson wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>I get all my nm-admin mail through the gated nm-discuss list, and it >>has *not* been quiet. Please check your subscription details if you >>are not receiving anything! > > I see the web archives > (http://cipsa.physik.uni-freibu

Re: Usage of this list.

Michael Beattie wrote: > > Would those posting 'Re: .*NM.*' *PLEASE* go and reread the description of > this mailing list. > Whoops. nm-discuss seems to be fubared. Is there another list to talk about the nm process until it gets fixed or moved to d.o? Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine ?

Colin Watson wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>I get all my nm-admin mail through the gated nm-discuss list, and it >>has *not* been quiet. Please check your subscription details if you >>are not receiving anything! > > I see the web archives > (http://cipsa.physik.uni-freib