On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> Here's the control file, so you can see what it's for:
>
> Source: libsafe
> Section: libs
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Ron Rademaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Standards-Version: 3.1.1
>
Ron, do you have a sponsor yet? If not I'd be willing to spo
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, John O Sullivan wrote:
> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me if I'd be breaking any rules by packaging this
> software and placing the binaries and data files under /opt/empire?
/opt is for third-party ("addon") software. If your package becomes part
of the Debian distribution then it
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if I'd be breaking any rules by packaging this
software and placing the binaries and data files under /opt/empire?
I've been talking to upstream and their opinion is that making the
server FHS compliant isn't really feasible at the moment. This code
has been around for over 1
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if I'd be breaking any rules by packaging this
software and placing the binaries and data files under /opt/empire?
I've been talking to upstream and their opinion is that making the
server FHS compliant isn't really feasible at the moment. This code
has been around for over
Hello,
On http://supersonic.plukwa.net/~baran/tek/linux/debian/ you will find
two packages, cookietool (two tools for maintaing fortunes database,
GPL) and ult1mo-fonts (Type1 ISO-8859-2 fonts, non free). These are my
first packages (although not so new, I work on them for some time). I'm
looking
Hello,
On http://supersonic.plukwa.net/~baran/tek/linux/debian/ you will find
two packages, cookietool (two tools for maintaing fortunes database,
GPL) and ult1mo-fonts (Type1 ISO-8859-2 fonts, non free). These are my
first packages (although not so new, I work on them for some time). I'm
looking
6 matches
Mail list logo
