> "Peter" == Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Currently, I'm doing: dh_movefiles (cd
Peter> ./debian/gre-doc/usr/doc/ ; mv gre gre-doc) But that
Peter> defeats the purpose of using dh_movefiles.
I would use dh_installdocs to install it directly from the source
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 03:16:04PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Files get moved from:
> ./debian/tmp/usr/doc/gre/html [1]
> to
> ./debian/gre-doc/usr/doc/gre/html
>
> But how do I tell dh_movefiles to move them instead to:
> ./debian/gre-doc/usr/doc/gre-doc/html
I think there's no way to
Trying my first multi-package using slink's debhelper (it's an
unofficial package, and I'm still using slink on production
so...) and I have an easy question regarding dh_movefiles.
In order to move an HTML tree into the gre-doc package, the file
debian/gre-doc.files has:
usr/doc/gre/html
Files
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This makes it rather short, so feel free to add other important info.
Something like this better? ("disasm" was/is wrapped by your MUA)
Description: Binary file viewer with builtin editors for bin, hex & disasm
Along with the view functionality th
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 02:26:01PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> > > Since debian/copyright is derived from the original copyright file,
> > > should the first error be fixed with the upstream?
> >
> > Presuming this is GPL or such, you can change the text saying where the
> > user can get th
Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> Description: Binary file viewer with built-in editors for bin, hex &
> disasm
> Biew is Binary vIEWer with built-in editor for binary,
> hexadecimal and disassembler modes. The program also has text viewer
> with different Russia codepages support (
Quoting Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:15:19PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> > Since debian/copyright is derived from the original copyright file,
> > should the first error be fixed with the upstream?
>
> Presuming this is GPL or such, you can change the text s
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:15:19PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> Should I first of all apply to new-maintainer, or is it better to
> first get a sponsor for my package?
I think you will get an application manager assigned to you, and that person
will kind of be a sponsor... do check with new-m
Hi,
I've been lurking for a while on -mentors and -devel,
checking out the developers-reference etc. and
packaged a software I think can be useful.
Now to the questions :)
Should I first of all apply to new-maintainer, or is it better to
first get a sponsor for my package?
The software I've pac
Hi to all and excuse me for this OT message,
Hi William, becouse I'm not sure my e-mail will arrive you I send this
mail to lists to say you I've reply to your mails. So tell me if you've receive
the last I send you.
Gree to all and excuse me enymore
--
Maurizio Boriani
General Service
Thus spake Jordi Mallach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Do you need to have modules for all sound devices for this to work?
> >
> > No, the sound card definitions are hardcoded in the main file.
>
> Ok, you get your Soundblaster detected but you have no compiled module in
> your kernel. What next?
11 matches
Mail list logo