Re: How can I use a `pdf-viewer'?

2000-04-30 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 07:28:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > if a package needs to view pdf-files it has to depend on the virtual > > > package `pdf-viewer'. Is there a better possibility to view pdfs from the > > > package then making a dependency on `mime-support' and to use `see'? > > > >

Re: How can I use a `pdf-viewer'?

2000-04-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 04:37:08PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > if a package needs to view pdf-files it has to depend on the virtual > > package `pdf-viewer'. Is there a better possibility to view pdfs from the > > package then making a dependency on `mim

Re: ITP and sponsor needed: texdoctk

2000-04-30 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I would like to package texdoctk for Debian and I'm looking for a sponsor. Hello Adrian, I'll be happy to sponsor this for you. Regards, tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Danger + Survival = Fun http://www.debian.org |(Neil Peart)

Re: How can I use a `pdf-viewer'?

2000-04-30 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 04:37:08PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > if a package needs to view pdf-files it has to depend on the virtual > package `pdf-viewer'. Is there a better possibility to view pdfs from the > package then making a dependency on `mime-support' and to use `see'? Just using `see' (a

ITP and sponsor needed: texdoctk

2000-04-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, I would like to package texdoctk for Debian and I'm looking for a sponsor. Description: GUI for easier access of TeX package and program documentations texdoctk is a GUI for easier access of a large part of the vast amount of package and program documentations and tutorials for TeX and its

How can I use a `pdf-viewer'?

2000-04-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, if a package needs to view pdf-files it has to depend on the virtual package `pdf-viewer'. Is there a better possibility to view pdfs from the package then making a dependency on `mime-support' and to use `see'? Thanks, Adrian -- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater