On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 11:34:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Disclaimer: IATTIMS
??
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Your package should make no assumptions about the existence of
> > /usr/local; it's entirely at the discretion of the sysadmin what to
> > put there. *If* t
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 08:47:15AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Dec 1999, Seth R Arnold wrote:
>
> I'm going to have anything automatic turned off `as-shipped', and merely
> inform the admin to edit the configuration file. Later I'll add support
> for debconf.
Ok then, this
On Sun, 12 Dec 1999, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 11:34:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Disclaimer: IATTIMS
Or IATTWA
> [this is a new one to me! :]
>
> [... cutting and compressing ...]
[More cutting]
> > So what it looks like at this point:
> >
> > Main configura
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:13:39PM +, Chris Rutter wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > As Antti-Juhani says, use lowercase. It doesn't matter what directory
> > the .orig.tar.gz unpacks to; dpkg-source will cope. Don't extract it,
> > rename it, and recreate the .orig.tar
Chris Rutter wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > As Antti-Juhani says, use lowercase. It doesn't matter what directory
> > the .orig.tar.gz unpacks to; dpkg-source will cope. Don't extract it,
> > rename it, and recreate the .orig.tar.gz just to fix the directory name;
> >
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> As Antti-Juhani says, use lowercase. It doesn't matter what directory
> the .orig.tar.gz unpacks to; dpkg-source will cope. Don't extract it,
> rename it, and recreate the .orig.tar.gz just to fix the directory name;
> it's better to use "pristine sourc
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:23:28AM +, Chris Rutter wrote:
> I'm slightly mystified, in my newsbieship, as to what this means.
>
> The source archive is `mLib-1.6.1.tar.gz', and it unpacks into a directory
> called `mLib-1.6.1'. I suppose `dpkg-source' is supposed to rename that
> to `mlib-1.6
On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 11:34:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Disclaimer: IATTIMS
[this is a new one to me! :]
[... cutting and compressing ...]
> I'm intending to make the server a seperate package from the dataset(s),
> and to have a -common package on the current assumption I'll have
>
Disclaimer: IATTIMS
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 05:13:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Also, if the minimal game dataset does need to be customized before use,
> > > /usr/share/doc//examples sounds right to me -- throwing them in
> > > /usr/lib/
[ -devel dropped from distribution list ]
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:23:28AM +, Chris Rutter wrote:
> Now; I was under the impression that all package names had to be lowercase;
> i.e. I would be uploading `libmlib1' and `libmlib-dev'. However, in
> section 4.2.1 of v3.1.0.0 of the Debian Pac
I'm packaging mLib[1], a library much like `glib'.
Now; I was under the impression that all package names had to be lowercase;
i.e. I would be uploading `libmlib1' and `libmlib-dev'. However, in
section 4.2.1 of v3.1.0.0 of the Debian Packaging Manual:
4 Control files and their fields
[
On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 05:13:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Also, if the minimal game dataset does need to be customized before use,
> > /usr/share/doc//examples sounds right to me -- throwing them in
> > /usr/lib/ and requiring customization Just Seems Wrong -- they
> > really *are* exa
On Sun, 12 Dec 1999, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> IANADD(Y)
Me neither.
> I do think /usr/lib/ is the right place for the binaries; mozilla
> does it that way, rpm stores scripts and programs there, and now I am
> getting tired of looking for more -- so you can't be too far off. :)
>
> Also, if the
13 matches
Mail list logo
