Re: debhelper: dh_fixperms should come after dh_suidregister (was: Re: setgid stuff)

1999-11-28 Thread Brian May
> "Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Julian> From the example /usr/(share/)doc/debhelper/examples/rules Julian> in potato: [...] Julian> dh_fixperms Julian> # You may want to make some executables suid here. Julian> dh_suidregister Julian> [...]

Re: debhelper: dh_fixperms should come after dh_suidregister (was: Re: setgid stuff)

1999-11-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
> With all due respect, I think you misunderstood the problem. > > The problem here is that "dh_fixperms" runs *before* "dh_suidregister". > This is how dh_make, from slink does it. I have heard potato > might be that same. > > 1. dh_fixperms removes the setuid bit. > > 2. dh_suidregister fails

Re: debhelper: dh_fixperms should come after dh_suidregister (was: Re: setgid stuff)

1999-11-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 02:57:45PM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote: > Hi, > > and -no-. > > If you put fixperms after suidregister, you undo its work. Also, fixperms > establishes a "perm baseline" that you modify by adding calls to chown and > chmod after fixperms and before suidregister. You make this c