manpages in new package already present

1999-10-31 Thread Alexander Koch
Well, I am packaging utftpd (a feature-rich tftp daemon, useful with "cisco parks" and stuff) and the following unusual (to me at least) manpages are supplied in the package: ---> man1: total 3 -rw-r--r-- 1 efraim efraim855 Mar 22 1999 ansi2knr.1.gz man3: total 9 -rw-r--r-- 1 efrai

Re: Policy 3.0.0 and /usr/X11R6/man ?

1999-10-31 Thread Stephan A Suerken
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > > > The problem here seems to be, that some people want to place all X > > dependent programs under /usr/X11R6 while others mean that only the > > X11 core should be under /usr/X11R6 > > BTW, I decide to place xwatch in /u

problems with bindir/mandir

1999-10-31 Thread Jordi
Hello, Trying to build a package, aterm, following the maint-guide docs, I come to a problem, and although I have tried many possible solutions, the new .debs I produce seem to be worse than the previous. Following maint-guide instructions: I untar the sources onto /usr/local/src/aterm/aterm-0.3

Re: Policy 3.0.0 and /usr/X11R6/man ?

1999-10-31 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 12:30:19PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > > > The problem here seems to be, that some people want to place all X > > dependent programs under /usr/X11R6 while others mean that only the > > X11 core should be under /usr/X11R6 > > BTW, I decide t