Hi!
I have the following problem:
due to an error I uploaded my package with a wrong revision number i.e.
1.4.3-L2.0.6-9 instead of 1.4.3-L2.0.6-8 . How can I get this correct?
I could simply increase the number, but I want to know wether there is a
more "correct" way.
Christoph
--
* Christoph
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually James Troup appears to be working on this.
No, I'm not. I posted a RTP, and Phil Hands & Herbert Xu both said
they would give packaging it a shot.
--
James
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 12:19:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Actually James Troup appears to be working on this. So you might want to mail
> him before you get going.
oops... Thanks very much for pointing this out!
Can you tell me where you found this so I can avoid future mistakes? I
Actually James Troup appears to be working on this. So you might want to mail
him before you get going.
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 11:59:48AM -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:
[...]
> Would someone consider sponsoring this package? I think it's very important
> to include this in Potato.
I will glad to sponsor you
regards
Andrea
--
Andrea Fanfani
[EMAIL PROT
Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> The problem here seems to be, that some people want to place all X
> dependent programs under /usr/X11R6 while others mean that only the
> X11 core should be under /usr/X11R6
BTW, I decide to place xwatch in /usr/X11R6 beacuse it has an
app-defaults file. It would be s
I've just packaged the Linux port of OpenSSH for Debian (Available at
ftp://bolverk.penguinpowered.com/openssh/debian).
Would someone consider sponsoring this package? I think it's very important
to include this in Potato.
TIA.
-Dan
--
"Beware he who would deny you access to information, for i
hi
i've debianized troll-ftpd 1.24 by troll tech
i'm not sure on the debian files can anyone test it (only debian
functionality, not the program functions)??
the actual position of package is:
http://www.trek.eu.org/devel/troll-ftpd.html
many 10x
3 http://www.trek.eu.org/
k
Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem here seems to be, that some people want to place all X
> dependent programs under /usr/X11R6 while others mean that only the
> X11 core should be under /usr/X11R6 and a third group wants to get rid
> of /usr/X11R6 which does not really fit
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The dictd package is built in .../debian/tmp, which contains
> > etc/init.d/dict in ../tmp/etc/init.d, and declares the script as a
> > conffile. The dict package is built in .../debian/tmp_2, and has no
Stephan A Suerken schrieb am Freitag, den 29. Oktober 1999:
> > Policy 3.* conforms to FHS 2, which says:
> >
> > Manual pages for commands and data under /usr/local are stored in
> > /usr/local/man. Manual pages for X11R6 are stored in /usr/X11R6/man.
> > ^^^
11 matches
Mail list logo