r-pdl vs. pdl (was Re: Semi-retiring: All (ok, some) packages must go!)

1999-10-11 Thread Raul Miller
Ok.. For the moment, I'm leaving r-pdl patches in pdl. R doesn't work for me, (this segfaults: perl -le 'use PDL::R; pnorm(.1,0.0,1.0);'). make test doesn't complain, but that's probably because the debian package doesn't include any tests for R. I'm seriously concerned about this. More genera

Re: protocol: closing bugs

1999-10-11 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 01:23:22PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > That said, yes, I would keep them open until potato is released. I thought protocol was to close bugs fixed in the latest upload, even though they are not fixed in stable? I suspect the BTS would have many more entries if we co

Re: Semi-retiring: All (ok, some) packages must go!

1999-10-11 Thread John Lapeyre
*Raul Miller wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 05:07:22PM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote: > > This is OK. Except that Raul Miller took pdl already. r-pdl is > > somewhat obsolete. I currently have it patched into the pdl source. > > The pdl people will take it upstream, but I haven't had time to c

Re: rpath in perlish *.so

1999-10-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 09:46:05PM -0400, Raul Miller écrivait: > I wrote: > > By the way, I don't suppose anyone knows why I'd be getting /lib > > defined in rpath on some perl .so files? [Looking at perl this should > > only be happening if I was running IRIX.] > > Or solaris. But I'm running n

rpath in perlish *.so

1999-10-11 Thread Raul Miller
I wrote: > By the way, I don't suppose anyone knows why I'd be getting /lib > defined in rpath on some perl .so files? [Looking at perl this should > only be happening if I was running IRIX.] Or solaris. But I'm running neither, so I Just Don't Get It. Any insight would be appreciated. Much tha

Re: Semi-retiring: All (ok, some) packages must go!

1999-10-11 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 05:07:22PM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote: > This is OK. Except that Raul Miller took pdl already. r-pdl is > somewhat obsolete. I currently have it patched into the pdl source. > The pdl people will take it upstream, but I haven't had time to correct > a couple of things.

Re: Semi-retiring: All (ok, some) packages must go!

1999-10-11 Thread John Lapeyre
*Stephen Zander wrote: > > "John" == John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [packages to adopt] > > I'll happily take the perl packages, which it think are the follwoing. > > r-pdl > pdl > pgperl > freewrl > libplot-perl This is OK. Except tha