Re: Package for sponsorship: hpack

1999-08-05 Thread Chris Butler
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 06:57:43PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > I'd be glad to sponsor the package, but would need a shell account outside > of the US do to so, since I'm in the land of the not-so-free. ISTR that even "working on a crypography package" is not allowed, even if the physical machine

help!!

1999-08-05 Thread Gwyneth Lloyd-Jones
I'm trying to build build the boot-floppies package with some modification to install some extra stuff. But I'm having trouble getting it to compile. Does anyone have any clue to what the following error means and how I might go about fixing it? I know it's hard to answer to a question like this

Re: e2compr packages up for sponsorship

1999-08-05 Thread Christopher C Chimelis
On 5 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Could be, but I don't think so. I rather think that it reads a long > instead of an __u32 and thus gets two __u32 into the long, which then > is far to big. Hehehe...that's typical :-) Wouldn't be the first time I've seen that either. C

Re: e2compr packages up for sponsorship

1999-08-05 Thread goswin . brederlow
From: Christopher C Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 5 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I did some fixes and cleanup on the defrag package and have e2dump >> 64Bit clean and 2GB proff now, but still have some bugs left to >> fix. Also the defrag tells me that it can't find inode xxx, where >

Re: e2compr packages up for sponsorship

1999-08-05 Thread Christopher C Chimelis
On 5 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I did some fixes and cleanup on the defrag package and have e2dump > 64Bit clean and 2GB proff now, but still have some bugs left to > fix. Also the defrag tells me that it can't find inode xxx, where xxx > is way to big (probably a 64 Bit problem in defra

Re: e2compr packages up for sponsorship

1999-08-05 Thread goswin . brederlow
From: Peter Moulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > Most of the packages up for sponsorship have been around for some > time (~a year) distributed from the e2compr web pages. I haven't > received any bug reports for the Debian packages yet, which suggests > that they should have relatively low maintenan