Hi,
>>"Peter" == Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Umm. I should be able to nuke /usr/doc on a machine and still
>> have it work
Peter> Why would you expect that? It's not policy yet. Some packages
Peter> have _all_ their useful info in /usr/d
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Jaldhar> I just uploaded the WDG HTML Validator. I put the HTML in
> Jaldhar> /usr/doc/wdg-html-validator. Policy says /usr/doc should
> Jaldhar> map to the URL /doc. And yes, /usr/lib/cgi-bin is the right
> Jaldhar> place to put CGI scripts.
>
>Umm. I should
Hi,
>>"Jaldhar" == Jaldhar H Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jaldhar> I just uploaded the WDG HTML Validator. I put the HTML in
Jaldhar> /usr/doc/wdg-html-validator. Policy says /usr/doc should
Jaldhar> map to the URL /doc. And yes, /usr/lib/cgi-bin is the right
Jaldhar> place to put CGI s
I just uploaded the WDG HTML Validator. I put the HTML in
/usr/doc/wdg-html-validator. Policy says /usr/doc should map to the URL
/doc. And yes, /usr/lib/cgi-bin is the right place to put CGI scripts.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 20 May 1999, Robert Woodcock wrote:
> Hello,
Robert Woodcock wrote:
> It needs some images to be accessible in a known place in the system's
> public html space (f.e. http://foo.bar.org/w3-validator/vh40.gif).
>
> The package will technically work without these images in a known location,
> however the resulting pages it generates will look
Hello, I'm considering packaging w3-validator, the W3 Consortium's HTML
validator. It's a CGI script.
It needs some images to be accessible in a known place in the system's
public html space (f.e. http://foo.bar.org/w3-validator/vh40.gif).
The package will technically work without these images in
6 matches
Mail list logo
