Re: Unidentified subject!

1999-04-06 Thread R Garth Wood
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > I am starting off on packaging some .debs for programs I have installed in > my /usr/local . I am hitting a stopper due to conflicting documentation > on debmake, debhelper, etc, and confusion on which is better. Mr Will > Lowe's documentation at

Re: Unidentified subject!

1999-04-06 Thread Will Lowe
> my /usr/local . I am hitting a stopper due to conflicting documentation > on debmake, debhelper, etc, and confusion on which is better. Mr Will > Lowe's documentation at Developer's Corner at debian seems out-of-date. Yup. I've debated asking the Documentation coordinator to remove it

Re: Binaries for other architectures

1999-04-06 Thread Peter Makholm
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lars runs dbuild on the source from time to time, but from > conversations with him, I gather he doesn't even vaguely have time to > process all the logs it produces. [...] Lars Who? I don't think I've heard a call for volunteers. If the logs aren't big

Re: Unidentified subject!

1999-04-06 Thread Brian Almeida
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 05:28:18PM +0530, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > The package I am currently looking at is cheops, single binary, with files > in lib and share. Once started, I can package for the two architectures I > have, i386 and sparc. Hate to break it to you, but cheops is already maintained

Unidentified subject!

1999-04-06 Thread Sanjeev Gupta
I am starting off on packaging some .debs for programs I have installed in my /usr/local . I am hitting a stopper due to conflicting documentation on debmake, debhelper, etc, and confusion on which is better. Mr Will Lowe's documentation at Developer's Corner at debian seems out-of-date.