> I have a question about cvs-buildpackage.
>
> I was surprised to see that all of the upstream .orig.tar.gz is
> injected into my CVS repository. I was expecting that the CVS
> repository would only hold those files modified or added for the
> debian build (only those files for which there are e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 24 Mar 1999, Roderick Schertler wrote:
> Date: 24 Mar 1999 12:29:37 -0500
> From: Roderick Schertler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: gated package
>
> There's a package of 3.5.8 at debs.fuller.edu that was made by Der
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 24 Mar 1999, Roderick Schertler wrote:
> Date: 24 Mar 1999 12:29:37 -0500
> From: Roderick Schertler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: gated package
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 1999 04:06:05 + (GMT), "Jeremy T. Bouse" <[EMAI
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 06:45:56PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Having a package Conflict with itself is only useful if its name doubles
> as a virtual package name. Since no package Provides xpm4g-dev, the
> Conflict has no effect. Just remove it.
Well, I guessed that it shouldn't be there,
Having a package Conflict with itself is only useful if its name doubles
as a virtual package name. Since no package Provides xpm4g-dev, the
Conflict has no effect. Just remove it.
Richard Braakman
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999 04:06:05 + (GMT), "Jeremy T. Bouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>
> I noticed on the WNPP page that someone had sent in an intent to
> package the GateD routing daemon...
There's a package of 3.5.8 at debs.fuller.edu that was made by Dermot
Bradley. He'd said it couldn't be
Hi,
I don't remember exactly whether did I do this on purpose or not,
but situation is this:
Package: xpm4g-dev
Version: 3.4k-1
Depends: xpm4g (= 3.4k-1), libc6-dev, xlib6g-dev
Conflicts: xpm4.7-dev, xpm4-dev, xpm4g-dev, xpm-bin
Replaces: xpm4.7 (<= 3.4g-9), xpm-bin
The thing that worries m
I have a question about cvs-buildpackage.
I was surprised to see that all of the upstream .orig.tar.gz is
injected into my CVS repository. I was expecting that the CVS
repository would only hold those files modified or added for the
debian build (only those files for which there are entries in th
> reply back... Any suggestions of what to do if I would actually like to
> get it and package it... I've actually almost got a working binary package
> for i386 built on my Intel machine... could even work on a Alpha port with
> my other machine...
Just package it. If the person's a year behind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I noticed on the WNPP page that someone had sent in an intent to
package the GateD routing daemon... However it shows that it's almost year
since it was add'd and haven't seen the package show up on the master
servers... I've tried contacting the the per
> On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> > (Don't know if it's the right list, but here goes)
> > Jobs -esp. jobs that pay good- are hard to find, and I was
> > wondering, since
> > being a Debian Developer can only be a Good Thing (TM) for my CV,
> > is there any
> > way I ca
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> (Don't know if it's the right list, but here goes)
> Jobs -esp. jobs that pay good- are hard to find, and I was wondering, since
> being a Debian Developer can only be a Good Thing (TM) for my CV, is
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999, Will Lowe wrote:
> Does anybody know what's wrong here? I run dpkg-buildpackage and get
> this:
>
> rm -rf debian/tmp debian/files* core debian/substvars
> dpkg-source -b rosegarden-2.1
> dpkg-source: building rosegarden using existing rosegarden_2.1.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-sour
13 matches
Mail list logo
