Re: dpkg-source: cannot represent change

Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (but don't crash if it doesn't exist - hence the "-" before "rm". So THAT'S what the '-' is for!! Weee... :) > > Of course, this is going to be an icky solution either way, because > > it means your package can't autobuild. > > Eh - why not. Because

Strategy for packaging aspell alternate dictionaries...

I am in the process of packaging various alternative dictionaries for the aspell spell checker (currently in potato). I downloaded the upstream source for the alternate dictionaries and tar zxvf-ed them. The README says - <"> Aspell Alternate Dictionary Package Version .10 January 11, 1998 This

Re: dpkg-source: cannot represent change

On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 12:31:54PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote: > Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > > Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 01:59:25PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > > > > Anything I can do to override this? It's on purpose, so that I don't > > > > h

Re: What to do when new version available upstream...

On Mon, 01 Mar 1999 14:20:26 -0800, Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > The only tricky bit I've found with the whole cvs-buildpackage system > is that you have to commit test builds and hand export them for testing > purposes if you don't want to constantly overwrite tags in the cvs > repos