Re: How to get hold of the "sather" maintainership?

1999-02-23 Thread Ole J. Tetlie
>-Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Norbert Nemec wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I posted couple days ago to debian-devel, asking about the package > > "sather", officially maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] He obviously took > > over that package two years ago and never submitted. Now

Re: location dependencies

1999-02-23 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Scott K. Ellis wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote: > > > I built my first test package a short time ago and all seemed to go well. I > > have a question about how to solve some location dependencies that exist in > > a > > few packages that I plan to create. >

Re: location dependencies

1999-02-23 Thread Scott K. Ellis
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote: > I built my first test package a short time ago and all seemed to go well. I > have a question about how to solve some location dependencies that exist in a > few packages that I plan to create. > > When I built my test package I specified to the 'configu

location dependencies

1999-02-23 Thread Wayne Cuddy
I built my first test package a short time ago and all seemed to go well. I have a question about how to solve some location dependencies that exist in a few packages that I plan to create. When I built my test package I specified to the 'configure' script the '--prefix' option was inside my debi

Re: /usr/bin vs /usr/sbin

1999-02-23 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: > > > > Sbin is for system run binaries, daemons, etc. This sounds > > > > appropriate here. > > > sbin is for STATIC binaries. > > Please read section 3.10 of fsstnd (/usr/doc/debian-policy/fsstnd) > > before you write something like this... > FSSTND i

Re: /usr/bin vs /usr/sbin

1999-02-23 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: > LTNT.. => > > On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 03:45:43AM -0800, George Bonser wrote: > > > > Sbin is for system run binaries, daemons, etc. This sounds appropriate > > > > here. > > > > > > sbin is for STATIC binaries. For some reason none of the Linux dis

Re: /usr/bin vs /usr/sbin

1999-02-23 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 12:47:57PM +0100, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > > > Sbin is for system run binaries, daemons, etc. This sounds > > > appropriate here. > > > sbin is for STATIC binaries. > > Please read section 3.10 of fsstnd (/usr/doc/debian-policy/fsstnd) > before you write something like th

Re: /usr/bin vs /usr/sbin

1999-02-23 Thread Joseph Carter
LTNT.. => On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 03:45:43AM -0800, George Bonser wrote: > > > Sbin is for system run binaries, daemons, etc. This sounds appropriate > > > here. > > > > sbin is for STATIC binaries. For some reason none of the Linux dists > > (unless slackware does and the knghtbrd package ha

Re: /usr/bin vs /usr/sbin

1999-02-23 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joseph> On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 03:45:43AM -0800, George Bonser wrote: >> Uhm, I have always been taught that sbin is for things used by superuser. >> Things the sysadmin or system needs but that you want out of the general >> user'