Richard Braakman writes:
> No, then the graphics would be separated from the program, which the
> license doesn't allow :)
The program is GPL. I read the license on the graphics as saying that they
can be used only with the program, not that they cannot be distributed
separately.
> It may be pos
John Hasler wrote:
> > Can such a package go into contrib or nonfree?
>
> The graphics would have to go into nonfree. The program would have to go
> into contrib if it depends on the graphics but could go into main if it is
> usable without them.
No, then the graphics would be separated from the
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, Nick Holgate wrote:
>
>
> > Package up a boot-m68k package, and make it architecture: any. (or even,
> > architecture:all)
> >
> > We'll be doing something similar for debian-sparc shortly.
> >
> > Jules
> >
>
> Wouldn't the name 'boot-m68k' give the impression that the pack
Dale James Thompson writes:
> I maintain the package for the postilion mail reader. A new release has just
> come out (0.9.0) and has added a copyright for the included graphics. Here is
> the copyright file:
> All graphics, image and icon files icluded with Postilion are copyright
> 1998, 1999
pgpszdbnSGyPQ.pgp
Description: PGP message
> Package up a boot-m68k package, and make it architecture: any. (or even,
> architecture:all)
>
> We'll be doing something similar for debian-sparc shortly.
>
> Jules
>
Wouldn't the name 'boot-m68k' give the impression that the package contained
more than a single bootstrap method for one sub a
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Nick Holgate wrote:
>
> Can anybody give me some advice on which architecture and section to install
> a package?
>
> The package is a TFTP bootstrap loader for m68k/VME kernels, even though the
> it is specific for booting m68k/VME machines the binaries and configuration
> f
7 matches
Mail list logo
