On 01-Feb-99 Mark Ng wrote:
>
> I am working on a package that is GPLed, but the author
> pre-pends his own disclaimer just before the GPL.
>
> If I just copy the copyright file into the package's doc dir,
> lintian emits an error. (obviously).
>
> Should I prune the GPL from the copyright file
I am working on a package that is GPLed, but the author
pre-pends his own disclaimer just before the GPL.
If I just copy the copyright file into the package's doc dir,
lintian emits an error. (obviously).
Should I prune the GPL from the copyright file and say that the
software is distrubuted und
Several games ship the game as .real and as a shell script which
sets up needed parameters. Perhaps you could have .alpha and .stable
and either a) symlink or b) provide a script which calls one or the other based
on a conf file or command option.
Hey,
I have two packages of which I'd like to include two versions in the potato
distribution, at least temporarily: majordomo and pciutils.
There is an alpha version of the long-awaited majordomo 2.x available in a
CVS-tree, which I'd like to package if possible. On the pciutils package:
work is
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 03:35:06PM -0500, Shaleh wrote:
> On 31-Jan-99 John Travers wrote:
> > The program I am packaging defaults to putting its configuration files in
> > /usr/share/packagename/... along with an example file and a pixmap. How can
> > I
> You may have to edit the program's cod
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Shaleh wrote:
> Personally I do not think EVERY package belongs in /etc. Sytem control,
> sure.
> But small things, no. I am aware of the current policy, but I think a strict
> "everything goes here" is bound to have problems.
I disagree. One of the good things about De
Hi,
Like I stated in a previous message of mine, I'm having trouble with
diversions.
This seems to be the situation:
> lagrange:~# md5sum /usr/X11R6/bin/asclock* /usr/X11R6/man/man1/asclock*
> b706384a5d65706fab204e10b2da0558 /usr/X11R6/bin/asclock
> b706384a5d65706fab204e10b2da0558 /u
7 matches
Mail list logo