Dear Ben,
> the following msg was ignored in the discussion. Have I done something
> wrong? Is it unusual to discuss in devel, if U're no package-maintainer?
Your message was not "ignored" because we only just saw it! Count a few
days before reactions pop up. And then be aware that reactions ma
Hi,
the following msg was ignored in the discussion. Have I done something
wrong? Is it unusual to discuss in devel, if U're no package-maintainer? Or
is it the "style" of writing?
Thanx
Ben
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ben Bucksch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> The section in the control file is your suggestion for the section;
> the Debian archive administrators will override it as necessary.
> In this case, they changed it to contrib/x11, because it's an X program.
> (If you think this is bad, you might want to discuss it on debi
On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 02:42:45PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> I received a bug report on xwatch which I can fix easily.
> Here's a change to fix the wrong upload section at the same time
> (or change contrib/utils to contrib/x11 and just live with it).
> BTW, I wanted the package to be in ut
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Gilbey) writes:
>
> > (4) cd .. and then run: lintian foobar_1.1-4.changes. If there are
> > any errors (shown with E: and non-zero exit code; don't worry
> > about E: newer-standards-version if it comes up), go back to step
> > (1) again.
>
> Eh, you forg
5 matches
Mail list logo
