Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, you get mail from dinstall in any case.
Not quite; in pathological cases, dinstall won't send you mail,
because it can't know who to send it to (e.g. unreadable, non-existent
or corrupt .changes files).
--
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Grant Bowman writes:
> > This does not seem possible due to the massive amounts of e-mail reading
> > required on both debian-private and debian-devel. These are both
> > required reading for maintainers.
>
> Required reading? News to me. The Developer's Reference doe
Grant Bowman writes:
> This does not seem possible due to the massive amounts of e-mail reading
> required on both debian-private and debian-devel. These are both
> required reading for maintainers.
Required reading? News to me. The Developer's Reference does appear to
say that we must all subs
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 12:21:37PM -0500, matthew.r.pavlovich.1 wrote:
> I am a little confused on how to strip the signature from the pgp data in
> the new maintainer's e-mail. and which pgp data to use. there is the set
> of data, so to speak, at the end, and another block two paragraphs up.
Debian Project,
I will be unable to be a maintainer. Please remove my account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and remove my PGP key from the list.
One of the primary reasons that I am unable to help is that I wanted to be
a "part-time" or "casual" developer. This does not seem possible due to
the massive amo
Hi,
>>"Florian" == Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Florian> Hi! I know I get a mail if one of my packages is moved to
Florian> the archives successfully from incoming. Do I get mails,
Florian> too, if the package is rejected for some reason or something
Florian> other happens?
Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I know I get a mail if one of my packages is moved
> to the archives successfully from incoming.
> Do I get mails, too, if the package is rejected for
> some reason or something other happens? (Are there
> other possibilities wich can happen?)
Normally you will.
I am a little confused on how to strip the signature from the pgp data in
the new maintainer's e-mail. and which pgp data to use. there is the set
of data, so to speak, at the end, and another block two paragraphs up.
Once the signature is striped, do i simply decrypt the remailing text?
Thank
Gifs are not necessarily non-free. There is an ungiflib which reads and
writes GIF images. What IS non-free is the writing on GIF's that use LZW
compression because it is patented. So if it NEVER writes any GIF's you are
safe. if it writes gifs but not compressed gifs you are also safe. If it
Hi!
I know I get a mail if one of my packages is moved
to the archives successfully from incoming.
Do I get mails, too, if the package is rejected for
some reason or something other happens? (Are there
other possibilities wich can happen?)
I am asking because I think one of my packages
has vanish
I just thought of something about the package which I'm maintaining: It
uses GIFs to store the graphics it uses, but loads them using it's own
routines rather than a lib. Question is would it have to go into non-free?
As I have already uploaded it who do I inform, or do I upload a new
version?
Che
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 11:55:15PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi :-)
>
> I have a little problem with "my" package Moscow ML - the following comes from
> copyrght.cl, which really is from CAML Light (which Moscow ML is based
> upon...):
>
>
Hi,
>>"Zephaniah" == Zephaniah E, Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zephaniah> Ick, perhaps we could use a new field?
Umm, I think that is a bad idea. A new field should not be
introduced lightly, and having one just because of aesthetics is not
acceptable.
Zephaniah> This s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, When I ran deb-make on my package source, it appended a "1" to
> the package name in debian/control, for example. Why does deb-make
> do this?
BTW, while debmake is supported and does work, you probably want to be
us
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've used /var/state, and I don't add anything to smb.conf
> automatically or ask anything during install.
Sounds good.
> However, if there was
> already a linpopup entry in smb.conf, but commented out, I re-enable
> it.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I mailed my intention to overtake linux-conio to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> I got the following reply:
[...]
> (You are assumed to be in the process of becoming a Debian Developer
> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 19981201.)
[...
Chrony (essentially an xntp3 clone) includes two binaries: a daemon that
runs as root and a control program that runs in user space. To perform
certain operations the user running the control program must provide a
password which is stored in a file readable only by root. I want the
chrony packag
I would like to give these "Bug Free and Lintian Clean" (TM) packages away.
All packages have been converted to debhelper and should be easy, especially
as a training ground for beginning maintainers. I would also be more than
happy to help to ease transition.
These packages are effectively orph
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 02:55:03PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I tend to prefer versions like 1.04.9.beta10 or
> 1.04.9.pre5.beta10 ;-)
Ick, perhaps we could use a new field? This seems to come up a bit too
often, hmm, perhaps something in the policy could help?
Zephaniah E,
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 11:07:06PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> "ZEH" == Zephaniah E, Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ZEH> On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 10:51:09AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> Could you tell us, which program you are packageing ?
>
> ZEH> Repackaging really
Hi!
I mailed my intention to overtake linux-conio to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I got the
following reply:
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: GMX delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 10:21:41 -0500
To: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PR
21 matches
Mail list logo
