>> "ZEH" == Zephaniah E, Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ZEH> On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 10:51:09AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>> Could you tell us, which program you are packageing ?
ZEH> Repackaging really, tleds..
Thats fine. I use it to monitor the ippp0 ISDN device
>> Which files / w
Hi,
>>"Zephaniah" == Zephaniah E, Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zephaniah> A few questions.. 1: What is a good way for handling the
Zephaniah> version fields to reflect that the upstream version is a
Zephaniah> beta? In this case the upstream version is 1.05beta10,
Zephaniah> leaving me w
Joseph Carter wrote:
> Lintian checks against current standards version (or as current as it knows
> about) You can probably up the standards version to whatever lintian was
> built with. =>
No, there are large areas of policy that lintian does not check.
It's a linter, not a validator!
Richard
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 06:03 -0500, Zephaniah E, Hull wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 10:51:09AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> As far as doing the 2.0 first, errrm, someone else will have to test it
> as I'm on 2.1.x kernels, I could do a quick test, but nothing overly
> ex
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 09:21:30AM -0500, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
> I have tried installing Linux on my ThinkPad 385 XD, but it hasn't
> worked. When I first tried to install it, I got a message tha said A20
> gating failed. So I changed the boot-up disk that I was using, and now
> it goes through
I have tried installing Linux on my ThinkPad 385 XD, but it hasn't
worked. When I first tried to install it, I got a message tha said A20
gating failed. So I changed the boot-up disk that I was using, and now
it goes through the initial motions of loading the kernel, then it
restarts my computer.
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 10:51:09AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> "ZEH" == Zephaniah E, Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ZEH> 3: I've got a package which can be compiled with or without X
> ZEH> support, However the X support does not work without changing a
> ZEH> few settings in th
>> "ZEH" == Zephaniah E, Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ZEH> 3: I've got a package which can be compiled with or without X
ZEH> support, However the X support does not work without changing a
ZEH> few settings in the X config, as I don't use X I'm not the best
ZEH> one to try and figure out wha
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998 15:30:45 -0800, you wrote:
>I don't blindly trust pgp or ssh or gnupg, for obvious reasons.
Again, do you inspect the pgp sources before compiling them? If not,
how do you make sure that the sources are trustworthy?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !!
I'm having a few problems running applications outside of root, and I was
wondering if anyone would be able to assist me in correcting whatever is
on the fritz.
First is X11amp. It won't play any songs for some reason. Other MP3
players will play, but just not X11amp, which is my favorite.
Licq
"Zephaniah E, Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently the only lintian warning is a ancient-standards-version,
> which I am not wanting to bump up to current until I'm sure its
> compliant..
/usr/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.text.gz is your friend.
(Well it's mine anyway.)
--
J
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 07:17:51PM -0500, Zephaniah E, Hull wrote:
> 1: What is a good way for handling the version fields to reflect that
> the upstream version is a beta? In this case the upstream version is
> 1.05beta10, leaving me with a bit of a problem (for when 1.05 is
> actually released)..
A few questions..
1: What is a good way for handling the version fields to reflect that
the upstream version is a beta? In this case the upstream version is
1.05beta10, leaving me with a bit of a problem (for when 1.05 is
actually released)..
Note that I do have a good reason for packaging the bet
13 matches
Mail list logo
