On Sat, Sep 12, 1998 at 10:30:30AM -0700, Darren Benham wrote:
> Where is Lintian packaged .. or is it? I can't seem to find it via dselect on
> my Hamm CDs
lintian is a slink thing.
> Same with qmail.
qmail-src is in non-free on the ftp site.
pgpF7q4ZfMnDr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What do you suggest be done about this?
Raul Miller wrote:
> > Come up with some other name for CDs which include contrib.
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A different name change might take care of this: rename "main" to "debian".
Raul Miller wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do you suggest be done about this?
>
> Come up with some other name for CDs which include contrib.
A different name change might take care of this: rename "main" to "debian".
That makes it very clear what the relationsh
qmail is non-free. lintian is in slink, do not believe it made it into
Hamm.
Darren Benham wrote:
>
> Where is Lintian packaged .. or is it? I can't seem to find it via dselect on
> my Hamm CDs
>
> Same with qmail.
>
> --
> http://benham.net/index.html
> -B
Where is Lintian packaged .. or is it? I can't seem to find it via dselect on
my Hamm CDs
Same with qmail.
--
http://benham.net/index.html
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++> E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K-
w+++$(--) O
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raul> But note that contrib is being packaged as an official part of Debian.
>
> A small nit. It is being packaged on the official CD, but is
> not an official part of Debian. This maybe a distinction that
> makes no difference, but it is impo
On Sat, Sep 12, 1998 at 12:41:17AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > We don't WANT to make it easy to use non-free software, which is why we
> > haven't split non-free. We don't want to make it unreasonably hard either,
> > which is why we allow non-free and contrib sections to begin with. We just
>
Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We don't WANT to make it easy to use non-free software, which is why we
>> haven't split non-free. We don't want to make it unreasonably hard either,
>> which is why we allow non-free and
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We don't WANT to make it easy to use non-free software, which is why we
> haven't split non-free. We don't want to make it unreasonably hard either,
> which is why we allow non-free and contrib sections to begin with. We just
> don't want non-free softwa
9 matches
Mail list logo
