On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 11:31:15PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Stephen" == Stephen J Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Stephen> The package in question is a bit out of date and I need features in
> Stephen> the latest version for my own system, so I needed to upgrade to
>
Hi,
>>"Stephen" == Stephen J Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> The package in question is a bit out of date and I need features in
Stephen> the latest version for my own system, so I needed to upgrade to
Stephen> the latest version...and decided to do it with the packaging system..
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>
> > I know there have been talk about limiting syncing to master, so I'd want to
> > know if it's okay to use master?
>
> It's not, never has been :)
> (The very first time I logged in, I remember a notice asking people
> n
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 1998, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>
> : Second Q. Is master the best place to sync from for me? Or should I choose
> some
> : else site, to ease the burdon on master?
>
> I've got a full mirror available via anon rsync at debian.midco.net -
Ok, ive never made an NMU before...but am tempted to with a package
at the least I would like to know if there is any policy (written or
unwritten) on it?
The package in question is a bit out of date and I need features in
the latest version for my own system, so I needed to upgrade to
the lates
5 matches
Mail list logo
