Re: New release of iptraf

1998-06-23 Thread Frederic Peters
Hi; > > > Why not just have the file in /usr/doc/iptraf and run it from > > > there in the postinst? > > Well, /usr/doc is meant to be moving to /usr/share/doc with FHS, and > > /usr/share is meant to be for architecture-inspecific data. > It's a script isn't it? Scripts are rarely architecture-s

Re: New release of iptraf

1998-06-23 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Fri, Jun 19, 1998 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > So I have cfconv that can be launched to upgrade config files. It's a job > for postinst, no problem, my question is : Since cfconv is useless after > postinst, can I move it to /usr/doc/iptraf/ with a word in README.Debian > sayin

Re: closing bug#21739 + #22912 in xfstt

1998-06-23 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 at 03:33:22AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -ok...is this right? sounds right to me. > The question arose over the last bug when someone said that the bug was > against a version in stable (and hamm) but since the version with the fix > is going into slink (unstable) the

Re: New release of iptraf

1998-06-23 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 12:21:45PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 at 10:31:44PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > > > > > Why not just have the file in /usr/doc/iptraf and run it from > > > there in the postinst? > > > > Well, /usr/doc is

Re: New release of iptraf

1998-06-23 Thread James Troup
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 at 10:31:44PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > > > Why not just have the file in /usr/doc/iptraf and run it from > > there in the postinst? > > Well, /usr/doc is meant to be moving to /usr/share/doc with FHS, and > /usr/share is meant t