oops...moronic source error

1998-06-04 Thread Stephen Carpenter
This really isn't a big deal but... there have been some xfstt questions and I was thinking about it so I decided to ftp the source to myself (I didn't have it here at work) and as soon as I unpacked the source I realized I made an error when I packaged and uploaded it! This really isn't a big d

Re: ongoing support for bo/libc5

1998-06-04 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, tmancill wrote: > Do I compile twice and generate .debs for both releases with the same > version number? No. There is a README in bo-unstable explaining the numbering scheme. If you read it, you will see that it is well thought, and allows

Re: ongoing support for bo/libc5

1998-06-04 Thread tmancill
On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Jim wrote: > tmancill wrote: > > But the more I think about it, the more I believe > > that there will be a large number of router admins out there who won't be > > jumping to upgrade to hamm. > > There is a mechanism installed to allow this kind of thing... > > You can com

Re: ongoing support for bo/libc5

1998-06-04 Thread Jim
tmancill wrote: > But the more I think about it, the more I believe > that there will be a large number of router admins out there who won't be > jumping to upgrade to hamm. There is a mechanism installed to allow this kind of thing... You can compile your packages for hamm; this is a good thin

ongoing support for bo/libc5

1998-06-04 Thread tmancill
First my disclaimer - I'm quite the newbie to Debian-maintainership. I am working on the wanpipe package, initially developed. Back when he have gave me the package, he indicated that it needed updates for hamm, which I have completed. But the more I think about it, the more I believe that there